Offline
LarsErikKjell wrote:
dufc2019 wrote:
LarsErikKjell wrote:
Well how can we possibly know? So no I dont think so. He's 17. A manager doesnt just decide they 'dont rate' a player when they are 17 years old. Especially one as talented as Mochrie.has he ever played him thou ?
He is 17 and was sent on loan.
He didnt even play him in the betfred thou
Offline
Fotheringham gets game time - same position as Mochrie, same age
Mochrie was the best of youth.
Mellon doesn't rate him.
Offline
Conway11 wrote:
Fotheringham gets game time - same position as Mochrie, same age
Mochrie was the best of youth.
Mellon doesn't rate him.
Yes 3 times he's played him in front of Mochrie I believe, despite Mochrie being a regular for Scotland in the same age group. Bizarre
Offline
Conway11 wrote:
Fotheringham gets game time - same position as Mochrie, same age
Mochrie was the best of youth.
Mellon doesn't rate him.
Fotheringham has played 45 mins of league football. Calm down. They are not the same position. Kai is a winger. Mochrie a 10
Offline
So game time then? I'm perfectly calm. 100% he doesn't rate Mochrie. and FWIW you're wrong. They are both a 10.
Offline
LarsErikKjell wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Fotheringham gets game time - same position as Mochrie, same age
Mochrie was the best of youth.
Mellon doesn't rate him.
Fotheringham has played 45 mins of league football. Calm down. They are not the same position. Kai is a winger. Mochrie a 10
45 mins more then he's given mochrie. Mochrie played wide all season for nontrose
Offline
You can both keep saying it all you want but we are just splitting hairs here at the end of the day. Time will tell. But saying he 100% 'doesnt rate' Mochrie is a load of shite. Maybe he thinks he isnt quite ready yet. Have you seen anything to suggest otherwise?
I'll say again he is 17. Kai by all accounts impressed massively pre-season and has been right under the managers eyes all season while Mochrie has been training with the loan bubble group until now. So forgive me for not seeing Kai's 45 minutes against St Mirren as confirmation that MM doesnt rate Mochrie.
Offline
Player possibly missing due to personal circumstances.
Wonder what’s going on there?
Offline
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Player possibly missing due to personal circumstances.
Wonder what’s going on there?
Mellon called it a family matter
Offline
player tested positive.
re-tested (NHS) negative.
May be what Mellon was referring to, buying time...
doesn’t fill me with confidence re the private testing we use.
Offline
MockChop wrote:
player tested positive.
re-tested (NHS) negative.
May be what Mellon was referring to, buying time...
doesn’t fill me with confidence re the private testing we use.
That happened to st mirren early on in the season if I remember right? Had something like 5 positives, re-tested and then came back negative. Mental.
Offline
LarsErikKjell wrote:
MockChop wrote:
player tested positive.
re-tested (NHS) negative.
May be what Mellon was referring to, buying time...
doesn’t fill me with confidence re the private testing we use.
That happened to st mirren early on in the season if I remember right? Had something like 5 positives, re-tested and then came back negative. Mental.
Interesting that its not been made public, like at St mirren
Offline
MockChop wrote:
player tested positive.
re-tested (NHS) negative.
May be what Mellon was referring to, buying time...
doesn’t fill me with confidence re the private testing we use.
PCR tests are often fickle. I wouldn't worry too much about it, the same thing happened a number of times in the NFL this season and they had similar testing routines.
Offline
It's all just part of the overall process and regime, hence the assurance of the NHS test. Fingers crossed for a negative and therefore no track and trace interventions.
That said, i'd almost be all for shaking things up, having a backs to the walls performance with a few guys coming in to stake a claim and seeing where that gets us. if it meant more round pegs in round holes, it could serve us well.
I've officially lost count of the amount of times I've referenced pegs and holes now. It's so simple and effective. Has any tweak/alteration/player out of position ever actually worked for us in the last 5 years?
Offline
Shankland apparently
Offline
Siegrist, Smith, Sporle, McNulty, Clark, Edwards, Robson, Butcher, Harkes, Shankland, Fuchs
Subs: Deniz, Powers, Reynolds, Pawlett, Hoti, Bolton, Mochrie, Appere, Neilson.
Offline
Edwards & Butcher in @ CH. That needed changed but still persevering with Robson & Clark 🤦♂️
Offline
Siegrist
Edwards Butcher Robson
Smith Clark Harkes Fuchs Sporle
Mcnulty Shankland
Offline
Fotheringham must be injured. No way he'd have Mochrie ahead of him on the bench
Offline
I'm fucking done
Offline
Our markjng in the box is terrible. The opposition just need a corner.
Offline
FFS.
Offline
We’re as good as down, no organisation, no creativity, no fight
Online!
2 subs half time get mcnulty, harkes off and mochrie and appere on
We are fucking dreadful, absolutely zero organisation fight creativity, we’re finished