Shedtastic wrote:

What do you think Clark adds to the team?

 
👀

😁😁❤

Ha ha ha ha ha

SuperMario wrote:

Absolutely clueless.

Aye very good, he's put in a decent 20 minute performance and now he's the Messiah.

Time will tell who's right.

Shedtastic wrote:

SuperMario wrote:

Absolutely clueless.

Aye very good, he's put in a decent 20 minute performance and now he's the Messiah.

Time will tell who's right.

 
It was just a cheeky wee dig bringing it up mate. Didnt want to cause any issues.

I'm sure you are delighted as anyone when he popped that in but from the 2nd half of your message it sounds like you will be glad if he does fail. Strange... BUT enough of that, he changed the game for us yesterday and his clever link up play is massively underrated. He'll be a big play for us, I'm sure of it.

LarsErikKjell wrote:

Shedtastic wrote:

SuperMario wrote:

Absolutely clueless.

Aye very good, he's put in a decent 20 minute performance and now he's the Messiah.

Time will tell who's right.

 
It was just a cheeky wee dig bringing it up mate. Didnt want to cause any issues.

I'm sure you are delighted as anyone when he popped that in but from the 2nd half of your message it sounds like you will be glad if he does fail. Strange... BUT enough of that, he changed the game for us yesterday and his clever link up play is massively underrated. He'll be a big play for us, I'm sure of it.

 
I think you only need to look at how badly we tailed off last season once he got injured. We missed him badly and I am confident he will play a big role this season so long as he stays fit.

Snacks94 wrote:

Arabdownsouth wrote:

LarsErikKjell wrote:

 
It was just a cheeky wee dig bringing it up mate. Didnt want to cause any issues.

I'm sure you are delighted as anyone when he popped that in but from the 2nd half of your message it sounds like you will be glad if he does fail. Strange... BUT enough of that, he changed the game for us yesterday and his clever link up play is massively underrated. He'll be a big play for us, I'm sure of it.

 
I think you only need to look at how badly we tailed off last season once he got injured. We missed him badly and I am confident he will play a big role this season so long as he stays fit.

 
Important member of the squad. Won’t play every week and I think he understands that, but yesterday was very well managed, Appere worked the defence for an hour (something Clark couldn’t have done), then Clark comes on finds space against a tired defence and shows a killer instinct (something Appere possibly wouldn’t have done). Good management, everyone contributes, players happy, Mellon happy, fans happy!

Good post Snacks
 

Tek wrote:

Snacks94 wrote:

Arabdownsouth wrote:

 
I think you only need to look at how badly we tailed off last season once he got injured. We missed him badly and I am confident he will play a big role this season so long as he stays fit.

 
Important member of the squad. Won’t play every week and I think he understands that, but yesterday was very well managed, Appere worked the defence for an hour (something Clark couldn’t have done), then Clark comes on finds space against a tired defence and shows a killer instinct (something Appere possibly wouldn’t have done). Good management, everyone contributes, players happy, Mellon happy, fans happy!

Spot-on.

Can i just add young Louis isn't getting much love from our support at the moment but he is putting in a shift up front on his own and giving of his best.

At just 20 years old and in only his 2nd season as a Pro it's a tough ask. He'll get better. He has showed us enough in flashes previously to suggest he has real quality about him.
 

 
Agreed Tek. He is doing his best work off the ball at the moment. His GPS numbers must be fucking mental. Once we are a bit more settled and Shanks is back the pressure will be off him and he will improve. I still think his best position is drifting out to the left in a front 2. If we see him in that kind of position a few times then he'll show again what he is all about.

I think McMullan coming back will be a great addition to this team. His pace (maybe on the left?) With Bolton on the right and Shankland through the middle would be exciting away from home especially on the counter attack.

Staying up is of course the most important thing this season but provided we do that we could end up with a really good team next year with Micky giving youth a chance.

A different level of course but Chelsea are a great example of youth getting its chance albeit due to different circumstances. Some of their young players are really going to kick on next season with a season behind them and hopefully ours will too.

Rangers fans on twitter saying we are taking Jamie Murphy on loan.  As long as we aren't paying all of his wages I think that would be a good result.

smedDUm wrote:

Finn Seemann wrote:

Rangers fans on twitter saying we are taking Jamie Murphy on loan.  As long as we aren't paying all of his wages I think that would be a good result.

I'm trying to remember him so turned to Wicki.
- age 30, winger, 5'10"
- M'well, Sheff Utd, Brighton, The Rangers
- a hat-trick in a Euro Lge game with M'well
- Scottish caps x 2
- looks like a bit of a ned
 

 
7 goals in 10 games on loan at Burton Albion.

But did Sevco not already refuse to do business with us?

PatReilly wrote:

Arabdownsouth wrote:

smedDUm wrote:

I'm trying to remember him so turned to Wicki.
- age 30, winger, 5'10"
- M'well, Sheff Utd, Brighton, The Rangers
- a hat-trick in a Euro Lge game with M'well
- Scottish caps x 2
- looks like a bit of a ned
 

 
7 goals in 10 games on loan at Burton Albion.

But did Sevco not already refuse to do business with us?

I think that was a misinterpretation of Scott Burns' words. Mind reading it and thinking that doesn't mean what some folk have taken from it.

But is Jamie Murphy a likely target, given his age, and likely costs? 
 

 
Ah right haven't seen the direct quote from Scott Burns and was just going off what folk had said.

Arabdownsouth wrote:

 
 Ah right haven't seen the direct quote from Scott Burns and was just going off what folk had said.

I recall Burns wrote something like 'Rangers won't do business with United' as a direct reply to someone who asked a question about Jordan Jones, which I reckoned meant that particular piece of transfer speculation wasn't likely, rather than a downright refusal of the Ibrox side to ever have any dealing with United: to me, that wouldn't make much sense.
 

Daily Ranger and Courier saying Murphy not happening but Courier saying we are still working on a deal for Norwood.