Offline
The Sunday Post reporting today that Stuart Armstrong is going to Southampton for £10 (TEN) million. If, as I heard from Colin Stewart (I think) it is true that we have no sell-on clause for him because, "Celtic are really difficult to deal with that way and just don't allow them." then that surely seals the deal as the worst transfer in the history of football. Absolute disaster stuff. We've probably missed out on anything from £1-2 million. It's ok though because the debt is down eh?
Last edited by lifesanocean (07/1/2018 11:40 am)
Offline
lifesanocean wrote:
The Sunday Post reporting today that Stuart Armstrong is going to Southampton for £10 (TEN) million. If, as I heard from Colin Stewart (I think) it is true that we have no sell-on clause for him because, "Celtic are really difficult to deal with that way and just don't allow them." then that surely seals the deal as the worst transfer in the history of football. Absolute disaster stuff. We've probably missed out on anything from £1-2 million. It's ok though because the debt is down eh?
Its becauae utd are mugs to deal with.
Offline
Colin stewart would blame anything on anyone to try and save some face for Thompson.
A total wanker.
Offline
Celtic helped begin our downward spiral toward relegation when they bought our 3 best players for phuckin sweetie money. Chunts. They then helped to keep us down by giving loans to our nearest rivals last Season. Chunts. And it looks like they are doing the same this Season with the Midden. Chunts. Does anychunt wonder why fowk despise these chunts.
Offline
And another thing. Thompson stood on national telly on the 8th November and said that being in the Championship last Season rather than being in the Premiership had cost the Club £2.5M income. Well Stephen that completely negates the transfer fee we got for him. The deal you agreed. So we ended up gettin PHUCK-ALL.
Online!
This would be the same Celtic that don't do sell on fees who have just made £7.5 M on dick van dyke?
Offline
Beardy23 wrote:
This would be the same Celtic that don't do sell on fees who have just made £7.5 M on dick van dyke?
Obviously its sell on fees from teams they BUY from. Not from who they sell too.
We all know when lowell says jump thompson says "how high"
Offline
I'm sure at the time it was reported that there was a sell on fee, whatever the side will not benefit, it will go towards buying the rights to Gussie back.
Offline
shedboy wrote:
There is a sell on of 15% I believe.
That's what I thought too. So if this sale goes through and we pick up another 1.5 million for a player who wanted away anyway. Do we start to cut the chairman some slack?
Offline
Arabdownsouth wrote:
shedboy wrote:
There is a sell on of 15% I believe.
That's what I thought too. So if this sale goes through and we pick up another 1.5 million for a player who wanted away anyway. Do we start to cut the chairman some slack?
Nope. Why should we?
Online!
Cut him some slack?
or Give him enough rope?
Offline
Is the sell on for armstrong not capper at a certain amount? Im sure i remember this being the case.
I may be wrong, but reading all of the above, I get the feeling that we have no idea if there is a sell on and, if there is, what the quantum is.
Probably won't even be selt anyway 😁
Last edited by scarpia (07/1/2018 9:45 pm)