Tekel Towers - DUFC Fans Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



21/10/2015 9:40 pm  #1


defence problem

as we re having problems at the back who do you think we should be starting with?

bearing in mind we have Morris and Dixon on the injury list that leaves us with
McGowan, Dillon, Durnan, Donaldson, Souttar, Spark 

Far from the strongest defence to pick from



 
 

21/10/2015 9:55 pm  #2


Re: defence problem

Said it before and after Sunday more convinced than ever that McGowan starts at centre half.

Would maybe look to the younger players at right back and give Spark a go once the Sellick game is out the way as not sure Souttar mobile enough or motivated enough.

Left back I'd stick with Dillon short term as will hopefully have Dixon back in three weeks or so.

Other CH a real problem, Donaldson looked ok to me at start of season and might work ok beside McGowan.

Durnan gives me the fear big time.

Morris would be fine but obviously injury prone - we need a new CH come January if not before.

 

21/10/2015 10:01 pm  #3


Re: defence problem

McGowan and Dillon are the surer starters. Souttar the next best bet (hoping Mixu's starting to fix what's wrong in him), then a gamble. Durnan's confidence seems gone and season has been bad so far ,  no sure on Donaldson and wonder if Spark should have a chance.
Don't see training so not really qualified to guess or state a confident reply bud but that's mine anyhow.

 

21/10/2015 10:14 pm  #4


Re: defence problem

If playing 4 at the back right now, Spittal McGowan Souttar Dillon. 
Dillon to RB and Dixon in when he's fit.

Don't actually think personnel is that big a problem at the back when all fit, It's organisation and discipline to stay in shape that's been the issues, easily fixed by a half decent coaching team.   Durban shouldn't be near the team tho.

Last edited by TheShed (21/10/2015 10:17 pm)

 

21/10/2015 10:19 pm  #5


Re: defence problem

I'd go with McGowan rb, Morris Ch Dillon Ch and Dixon lb but McGowan did well at ch on Sunday.


Too much commotion
 

21/10/2015 10:23 pm  #6


Re: defence problem

lifesanocean wrote:

I'd go with McGowan rb, Morris Ch Dillon Ch and Dixon lb but McGowan did well at ch on Sunday.

 
Would be my choice too Nemo but I don't think all are fit bud.

 

21/10/2015 10:26 pm  #7


Re: defence problem

Arabnophobia wrote:

lifesanocean wrote:

I'd go with McGowan rb, Morris Ch Dillon Ch and Dixon lb but McGowan did well at ch on Sunday.

 
Would be my choice too Nemo but I don't think all are fit bud.

 
Aye, quite right, if they were all fit thats my choice. At the moment I'd go with Sundays back four but replace Durnan with Donaldson.


Too much commotion
 

21/10/2015 10:35 pm  #8


Re: defence problem

Know I'm gonna get flogged for this, but I would under certain circumstances have Pates at the back. Sure makes a mean tackle. Stops the game in its tracks. If he was fit of course.

 

21/10/2015 10:48 pm  #9


Re: defence problem

Billy_Hainey wrote:

Know I'm gonna get flogged for this, but I would under certain circumstances have Pates at the back. Sure makes a mean tackle. Stops the game in its tracks. If he was fit of course.

 
See why you say that bud. Don't think most will flogg you for that thought.
Already bad for conceding pens. Fighting fae
the back to the front is a good idea though.
We need more hard but fair influences throught the team and the protection that brings to the less a aggressive youth over being a soft target.
All tactics have been easy against us for too long. We need to be far less predictably soft and easy to read. Most managers could have planned a game plan weeks ahead of playing us over the last year or so and got it pretty much spot on.

 

21/10/2015 11:02 pm  #10


Re: defence problem

For Saturday

Souttar-McGowan-Durnan-Donaldson-Dillon

Sole instructions is to get the ball to fuck down the other end of the pitch,if it's to a man in tangerine all the better.

Let's start with the basics.

One clean sheet is all it takes to get the confidence back btw.Fitba's a simple game.

 

21/10/2015 11:03 pm  #11


Re: defence problem

Billy_Hainey wrote:

Know I'm gonna get flogged for this, but I would under certain circumstances have Pates at the back. Sure makes a mean tackle. Stops the game in its tracks. If he was fit of course.

Not as mad as it sounds.

He played loads of games at right back for Partick.
 

 

22/10/2015 12:09 am  #12


Re: defence problem

Is Garry Kenneth too wild a shout?

Yeah the lad is no Maldini but cares for the club, would presumably play for a smallish wage and he's just quit skonta riga - so should be match ready. Adds a bit of size and nastiness , if nothing else

Training at montrose - deal till Jan?


If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all.
 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum