Tekel Towers » Scott Allan

RogerTheAlien · 19/7/2015 4:51 pm

and If they don't accept the mcginn money we're phucked.

bowers · 21/7/2015 7:57 am

Rangrs back in for him.

Affshore · 21/7/2015 8:24 am

Theres absolutely nae fucking danger we'll sign him, if we do i'll buy a dundee strip and wear the fucker !!!

huntedbyafreak · 21/7/2015 8:27 am

Can't see Hibs selling him to Sevco though

Tangerine_Ultra · 21/7/2015 8:27 am

Affshore wrote:
Theres absolutely nae fucking danger we'll sign him, if we do i'll buy a dundee strip and wear the fucker !!!

Get the samba's and double denim outfit looked oot !

Affshore · 21/7/2015 9:08 am

Rolled up tully at the ready !

boabmos · 21/7/2015 9:11 am

Hopefully now we can put this one to bed, was a non starter. The boys a Rangers supporter, and they will offer him at least double the wages we can if not more.

Tangerine_Ultra · 21/7/2015 9:11 am

Affshore wrote:
Rolled up tully at the ready !

Hahaha FAF. Remember yi will need a Roma top aswell and jump aboot like a spazzy in the Derry. Oh and run aboot on the pitch when yi beat yir neighbours for the first time in 10 years.

bowers · 21/7/2015 9:12 am

huntedbyafreak wrote:
Can't see Hibs selling him to Sevco though

if the price is right they will

Beharder · 21/7/2015 10:13 am

There was a fair amount of misplaced anger about UTD selling to rival, this would be a major kick in the guts for Hibs fans. This really would be a case of a chairman not giving a shite about the fans.

Tek · 21/7/2015 12:53 pm

Hibs selling Scott Allan to Rangers (1 player) to Rangers 5 weeks before the window closes would be their Chairman 'not giving a shit', but us selling our two best players in the last few hours of a window to a team we're facing in a Final is 'misplaced ' anger on our support's part.

Are you Stephen Thompson, Beharder?

Beharder · 21/7/2015 3:04 pm

TEK no I am not ST. We had no chance of beating Celtic with or without GMS and Armstrong, past results showed that. Hibs and Rangers are currently reasonably well matched so allans transfer could change the dynamics between the two. Celtic were in a different league to UTD before the transfers, they still are.

Tek · 21/7/2015 3:10 pm

Beharder wrote:
TEK no I am not ST. We had no chance of beating Celtic with or without GMS and Armstrong, past results showed that. Hibs and Rangers are currently reasonably well matched so allans transfer could change the dynamics between the two. Celtic were in a different league to UTD before the transfers, they still are.

That's strange because i seem to recall we beat them 2-1 in the match previous to their sale in late December.

bowers · 21/7/2015 3:22 pm

Beharder wrote:
TEK no I am not ST. We had no chance of beating Celtic with or without GMS and Armstrong, past results showed that. Hibs and Rangers are currently reasonably well matched so allans transfer could change the dynamics between the two. Celtic were in a different league to UTD before the transfers, they still are.

No chance?

Did you go to or watch the scottish cup match at tannadice that we drew?
Playing with neither of the tim 2 in that game and we where very unlucky.

Beharder · 21/7/2015 3:32 pm

TEK remember that was at home im sure you know we lost 6-1 away last august with GMS & SA in the team. We had little to no chance of winning the final, 23 years of defeats the majority of them comprehensive. Its the hope that brings dissapointment.

Ex Houston Arab · 21/7/2015 3:36 pm

In over 100 years of existence, we have beaten Celtic in Glasgow 9 times. The last time being almost quarter of a century ago. We couldn't even beat St Johnstone at Celtic park

Tricky78 · 21/7/2015 3:47 pm

There is no danger we will sign Allan.
At one point we were being led to believe we were in for Allan, McKay and McGinn and people lapped it up.

If we were really in for McKay then where did this Bodul appear from all of a sudden?

Yes i'm a miserable glass half empty kind of guy at the moment.

Ex Houston Arab · 21/7/2015 3:51 pm

There is no way we would like at one player per position.
If we did and never got him, people would (rightly) be furious.

Tek · 21/7/2015 3:51 pm

Beharder wrote:
TEK remember that was at home im sure you know we lost 6-1 away last august with GMS & SA in the team. We had little to no chance of winning the final, 23 years of defeats the majority of them comprehensive. Its the hope that brings dissapointment.

I wish you had told me this in March,could have saved myself a fortune in ticket,beer,travel money.

GF80 · 21/7/2015 4:24 pm

I actually despair. With the attitude of some fans on here it's no wonder the team struggle to find the confidence going into big games. Not debating Celtic were very much the favourites, with or without those 2, but to say Utd had no chance of winning is a ridiculous statement and very disrespectful to every player in the team. Seriously, some fans could do with reminding themselves what 'supporting' a team actually means.

RRDH · 21/7/2015 4:54 pm

yeah never a chance he was signing. Very strange approach from United, never any danger ST thinks we were signing him either.

Beharder · 21/7/2015 4:59 pm

GF80 I said little to no chance our record in Glasgow backs up that statement. Dont confuse my realism with a lack of support. I will be in my usual seat on August 2nd raring to go.

Ex Houston Arab · 21/7/2015 6:12 pm

If you were ST and had paid £200k for Charlie Telfer, would you pay £350k for someone to come and play the same position?
How can we complain about running at a loss, then demand something like this?
I understand the goalkeeper, winger concerns etc but what is the massive hardon for Allan?
What do we do with Telfer then? Do we believe we are the type of club that can write off £200k?

bowers · 21/7/2015 7:18 pm

whos demanding we sign scott allan for £350k?

Ex Houston Arab · 21/7/2015 8:17 pm

how much do you think hubs would sell him for?
£350k is one of the more conservative estimates.

So do you think we should bench our £200k signing for him?