Online!

David_Blunkett wrote:
All fair points, that I couldn't disagree with any of them.
I just think Sibbald isn't good enough when asked to play in a role where he has to do more than the basics, injuries have probably forced the issue, if Naamo or Strain is fit it frees up Stephenson and I'd have Sevelj in there ahead of Sibbald.
But ultimately Goodwin chopping and changing the personnel, having to change the formation/tactics mid game so often is on him, we don't seem to have a recognised style of play at all.
Opinions on players differ between fans and I respect your opinion about Sibbald. What I would say is that every team needs a player who can win the ball back and keep play moving.
That lineup i listed wasn't trying to select a best 11, it was more a way of showing that you can select a side that gives you a solid back 4, numbers in midfield and still pose an attacking threat.
My patience is wearing very thin with Goodwin's pig headed defiance, as you say having to change personnel and shape so often after a passive start and going behind. In fact I'm pissed off with it!
Online!

Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
Offline

SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
We have to be,otherwise madness
Offline

SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
I have zero faith we sign a Striker.
Which means we are effectively weakening our options.
Online!

Why am I not surprised.
Don't worry lads the Haddie 2 will turn into deadly strikers very shortly.
Offline

The cooperation agreements mean players can play for both teams
Online!

Is it just me or does this January have 80 days in it 🤓
Offline

SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
He's not. He's joined the partnership agreement. I don't think United will want him cup tied so expect he'll be involved v Ayr United today.
Online!

Stillliving wrote:
The cooperation agreements mean players can play for both teams
Tell you what I'm willing to bet he doesn't start for us again this season.
Bookmark this and prove me wrong 🤓
Offline

Always_United wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
He's not. He's joined the partnership agreement. I don't think United will want him cup tied so expect he'll be involved v Ayr United today.
What is the difference between the two ? Does it mean he can play for both teams or something like that? Bizarre starting him at parkhead when I think the other two were fit and then punting him out loan. I would love him to start today and see if he can get a goal against a team he should be able to play well against if he is going to make it.
Online!

Always_United wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
He's not. He's joined the partnership agreement. I don't think United will want him cup tied so expect he'll be involved v Ayr United today.
Would be idiotic if he was involved with airdrie today
So you never know
Last edited by SuperMario (17/1/2026 10:02 am)
Online!

Slotbadger wrote:
Always_United wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
He's not. He's joined the partnership agreement. I don't think United will want him cup tied so expect he'll be involved v Ayr United today.
What is the difference between the two ? Does it mean he can play for both teams or something like that? Bizarre starting him at parkhead when I think the other two were fit and then punting him out loan. I would love him to start today and see if he can get a goal against a team he should be able to play well against if he is going to make it.
He can move between both teams out with transfer windows etc
That’s what I don’t get, why add him to the agreement if there isn’t another striker coming in, you’d expect him to be involved with us every week especially how the other two are playing
Offline

Slotbadger wrote:
Always_United wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Stirton away to airdrie
Surely bringing someone in
He's not. He's joined the partnership agreement. I don't think United will want him cup tied so expect he'll be involved v Ayr United today.
What is the difference between the two ? Does it mean he can play for both teams or something like that? Bizarre starting him at parkhead when I think the other two were fit and then punting him out loan. I would love him to start today and see if he can get a goal against a team he should be able to play well against if he is going to make it.
Cleall-Harding is also part of the same agreement and hasn't played a minute for Airdrie. It just opens up the option for them to play for Airdrie. I suspect he won't play for Airdrie, unless we sign a striker.
Offline

Someone has pointed out to me that we can make another loan signing, so long as they're under 21.
Anyone know of that is actually the case? ![]()
Offline

English championship clubs and Colorado rapids back in for Will Ferry most likely.
Offline

I thought Ferry was out of contract in the summer, I'd tell him we'll let him go then. We're short in other areas, don't need to source a left back just now as well.
Last edited by David_Blunkett (Yesterday 10:00 pm)
Offline
David_Blunkett wrote:
I thought Ferry was out of contract in the summer, I'd tell him we'll let him go then. We're short in other areas, don't need to source a left back just now as well.
Summer 2027
Offline
We’re one of the teams looking at James furlong, can see someone else getting him as a fee is to be paid and we won’t be paying anything until moneys there from ferry going