Online!

kdyteejay wrote:
Monny wrote:
Best of luck to the lad. I like him, but I couldn't see him coming back after those howlers.
I liked him also. Very good keeper with one flaw unfortunately. Still not sure it couldn’t be coached out of him by a decent coach.
I agree, the guy is a very good shot stopper and great distributor of the ball, the fact that he didn't improve with cross balls says more about the coaching than the player imo.
Offline

kdyteejay wrote:
Monny wrote:
Best of luck to the lad. I like him, but I couldn't see him coming back after those howlers.
I liked him also. Very good keeper with one flaw unfortunately. Still not sure it couldn’t be coached out of him by a decent coach.
Maybe it could have been. But we don’t have the luxury of being able to hang about until he figures out how to deal with such a massive weakness in his game. What has transpired is by far the best option. Hopefully his next move works out for him.
Thankfully, I think Goalkeeper is one of the easiest positions to get right as long as you’re not too fussy about specifics like distribution and ability with their feet. Theres lots of competent, experienced keepers sitting on benches and in the reserves down south that can do the basics to the required level, that would jump at the chance of a loan with regular game time.
Last edited by JerryDungle (05/1/2026 5:25 pm)
Offline

Feel a bit sorry for Kuch, but his confidence was gone and needed a fresh start. Wouldn't be surprised if he eventually makes us some money from sell-ons.
Offline

Great bit of business. An experienced GK who can’t catch crosses is embarrassing. He isn’t 17 and learning the most basic bits of being a keeper. BBC stats showed he was an average shot stopper for the league.
Alnwick was a good keeper at St Mirren. If we get that guy back it would be a great signing. Would also be delighted with either of hearts 2 backups.
If we loan Stirton it is a shambles. He has been on loan and done well already. Even if we plan to sign another striker it will mean we are planning to give 2 shite strikers who will be gone in the summer game time ahead of a promising Scottish talent. He turns 19 this month, so I wouldn’t even say that young any more.
Online!

Slotbadger wrote:
Great bit of business. An experienced GK who can’t catch crosses is embarrassing. He isn’t 17 and learning the most basic bits of being a keeper. BBC stats showed he was an average shot stopper for the league.
Alnwick was a good keeper at St Mirren. If we get that guy back it would be a great signing. Would also be delighted with either of hearts 2 backups.
If we loan Stirton it is a shambles. He has been on loan and done well already. Even if we plan to sign another striker it will mean we are planning to give 2 shite strikers who will be gone in the summer game time ahead of a promising Scottish talent. He turns 19 this month, so I wouldn’t even say that young any more.
Stirton isn't ready to lead the line, be realistic. I hope we sign someone who is.
Offline

Stirton is off to Airdrie until the end of the season
Offline

Good luck to Kuch.
No seeing the great rush to sign a goalie.
For me another striker is urgent.
Watters is shite.
Moller a damp squib.
Dolcek wants back to the Balkans.
Between SCH Kereztes Iovu Barista and the shoehorned options of Sevelj / Naamo/ Stephenson we've enough at the back.
Support for Supsford is what we need
Offline

Conway11 wrote:
Stirton is off to Airdrie until the end of the season
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
Offline

Shakey Isles Arab wrote:
Good luck to Kuch.
No seeing the great rush to sign a goalie.
For me another striker is urgent.
Watters is shite.
Moller a damp squib.
Dolcek wants back to the Balkans.
Between SCH Kereztes Iovu Barista and the shoehorned options of Sevelj / Naamo/ Stephenson we've enough at the back.
Support for Supsford is what we need
Agreed, Shakey.
I'd like to see a new Keeper signed this window, don't get me wrong, but without a Striker to put the ball in the net we will achieve nothing this season.
Online!

Tek wrote:
Shakey Isles Arab wrote:
Good luck to Kuch.
No seeing the great rush to sign a goalie.
For me another striker is urgent.
Watters is shite.
Moller a damp squib.
Dolcek wants back to the Balkans.
Between SCH Kereztes Iovu Barista and the shoehorned options of Sevelj / Naamo/ Stephenson we've enough at the back.
Support for Supsford is what we needAgreed, Shakey.
I'd like to see a new Keeper signed this window, don't get me wrong, but without a Striker to put the ball in the net we will achieve nothing this season.
Our problems this season have all been at the back not up front. The reason we are not sitting much higher in the table is our calamity keeper and calamitous defence. We've scored goals regularly but thrown away countless winning positions, a new striker isn't going to fix that.
Offline

Arabdownsouth wrote:
Tek wrote:
Shakey Isles Arab wrote:
Good luck to Kuch.
No seeing the great rush to sign a goalie.
For me another striker is urgent.
Watters is shite.
Moller a damp squib.
Dolcek wants back to the Balkans.
Between SCH Kereztes Iovu Barista and the shoehorned options of Sevelj / Naamo/ Stephenson we've enough at the back.
Support for Supsford is what we needAgreed, Shakey.
I'd like to see a new Keeper signed this window, don't get me wrong, but without a Striker to put the ball in the net we will achieve nothing this season.
Our problems this season have all been at the back not up front. The reason we are not sitting much higher in the table is our calamity keeper and calamitous defence. We've scored goals regularly but thrown away countless winning positions, a new striker isn't going to fix that.
Both have been our problems.
Watters hasn't scored a goal since July. Moller hasn't scored a goal at all.
Last edited by Wee Bobo (06/1/2026 7:23 am)
Offline

Tek wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Stirton is off to Airdrie until the end of the season
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
That’s my point as well. I don’t know if he is ready to lead the line (no does btw because he hasn’t been given the chance except in 3-1 win away from home recently where he played well) but from what I have seen he is already a better player than Moller/Watters. I suspect if he had been given the same game time as those two he would have scored more goals and we would be higher up the league.
If we loan him out it will be to give game to two players who I think are inferior, and will leave in the summer.
Offline

Tek wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Stirton is off to Airdrie until the end of the season
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right now
Offline

Conway11 wrote:
Tek wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Stirton is off to Airdrie until the end of the season
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right now
I might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Offline

Stirton is not ready to start ahead of Watters or Moller (he was fine at Livi but largely ineffective). Neither Watters or Moller are what we need in the lead the line striker. I'd ditch one if we can if we can find someone better for that role. I'm OK with Stirton getting more game time and also OK with him going on loan if that means more game time, but he's not ready to be the main man. I think a loan would work best to be honest. The lad Barney Stewart (21) has just done 6 months at Dunfermline and scored goals and developed. He's been recalled for the second half of the season. Stirton is still only 18. He's got time. Pushing him now is not the right thing in my opinion.
Offline

Macho Man wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Tek wrote:
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right nowI might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Yep 3 year deal
Online!

Wee Bobo wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
Tek wrote:
Agreed, Shakey.
I'd like to see a new Keeper signed this window, don't get me wrong, but without a Striker to put the ball in the net we will achieve nothing this season.
Our problems this season have all been at the back not up front. The reason we are not sitting much higher in the table is our calamity keeper and calamitous defence. We've scored goals regularly but thrown away countless winning positions, a new striker isn't going to fix that.Both have been our problems.
Watters hasn't scored a goal since July. Moller hasn't scored a goal at all.
Watters was injured for a large part of that but he did score a few goals in a short space of time before that so there is definitely something there,but people are not giving him any chance to recover fitness and form before dismissing him as a haddie. Regardless of that though, as I said already,it's a fact that if we hadn't conceded so many soft and often ridiculous goals then we'd be sitting way higher in the table and our goals for column wouldn't even be up for debate
Online!

SuperMario wrote:
Macho Man wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right nowI might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Yep 3 year deal
We should ask this Greek superleague club if they fancy a two for 1 deal
Offline

Jamestown analytics has Kerestzes on hearts radar. Seen his agent this morning giving it the usual to the press about how everyone wants him.
Offline

Macho Man wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
Tek wrote:
If we do that before we sign a Striker then i despair.
I'd be looking at moving Moller on this window and Watters cannot be trusted to stay fit (not that he offers much when he is).
People keep saying Stirton isn't ready, but he 100% would have done better than Moller in his 16 appearances if he had the luxury of getting such a run of games himself.
It's also rather moronic that Stirton could have been at Airdrie and had a run of games since October. What was the point of keeping him as 'cover', never playing him, and then putting him on loan after he starts and does 'ok'?
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right nowI might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Apologies yes! 3 years of that. Deary me
Offline

SuperMario wrote:
Macho Man wrote:
Conway11 wrote:
100% to all points. I do believe a striker is done and dusted but totally agree on Stirton.
I’d cancel the loans of Moller and Watters right nowI might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Yep 3 year deal
What bright spark thought he should get 3 years?
Offline

RogerTheAlien wrote:
Jamestown analytics has Kerestzes on hearts radar. Seen his agent this morning giving it the usual to the press about how everyone wants him.
Seen that also and that KK says he doesn't know if he will be in Scotland or elsewhere - in June he said "I want to stay at United longer than agreed"
What the hell has gone so wrong with our squad in 6 months??
Offline

kdyteejay wrote:
SuperMario wrote:
Macho Man wrote:
I might be wrong, but did we not buy Moller outright.
Yep 3 year dealWhat bright spark thought he should get 3 years?
Goodwin - but take your pick on which one
Online!
Conway11 wrote:
RogerTheAlien wrote:
Jamestown analytics has Kerestzes on hearts radar. Seen his agent this morning giving it the usual to the press about how everyone wants him.
Seen that also and that KK says he doesn't know if he will be in Scotland or elsewhere - in June he said "I want to stay at United longer than agreed"
What the hell has gone so wrong with our squad in 6 months??
Supposedly on Hearts radar, if he thinks he can earn more elsewhere he's not going to commit to us despite us having already agreed a fee with his parent club.