Offline
Injuries v influence v cost v age v hunger for the badge ?
- keep him for me.
I'd go so far as to say mebbe a wee bit cotton wool in training.
More swims - something, to get another years contract fae old bones and wise heid.
- Thoughts gentlemen.
Offline
60% of me says keep, the other 40% says get rid. There’s no denying we’re a better team with him in it. Keep.
Offline
Ross Docherty, when fit, makes us a better team, there's not one Arab who'd disagree with this.
But that's the issue, how many games missed over two seasons and not for major injuries, it all seems like knocks or wee strains and he's now 32, it won't get better.
When we're operating with such a tight first team squad, can we afford a player who spends so many weeks in the stand?
Then if you consider that he was picked up from the Championship, having bounced around teams that never really achieved anything, he'd never played a top flight game, is it unrealistic to expect to pick up a similar player from there or from one of our rivals, who we could rely on?
We gave a deal to Moult for this season and he's barely featured, sentiment should play no part in contract decisions.
Offline
95% of the season unfit. Much much better and dependable players out there. Massive reasons he never got out the championship until 2024 at 31 years old.
Offline
It's a 100% yes for me, our success rating with him in the team says everything.
I agree with a lot of the points above but it's been a bit of the perfect storm or rather the not so perfect.
With Docherty injured its been magnified by a couple of facts.
(1) Sibbald injured for 6 months.
(2) Odada as a back up, clearly miles off it.
(3) Campbell, just not the player we expected from his Motherwell days. Still time though but the jury is definitely out on him.
(4) Babunski not really a 6 or an 8 having to play his role.
(5) Holt, apart from St Mirren, clearly out his depth in there.
With better recruitment and a wee bit more luck we are maybe not pushing this guy back quite as early. Take the Derby match two weeks ago for example, he is on the bench with his quad strapped up because we are so limited in ability in the middle of the pitch and he's clearly nowhere near ready to play.
Offline
There's a stat out there somewhere which shows something like, Docherty plays 90 minutes, then either comes off earlier than we'd like in the next game or misses it altogether, how we line up on Sunday might give us a better idea.
As the post above states though, maybe his absence is more telling because the replacements aren't up to it.
As things stand Sevelj is the only one in our squad as a certain starter next season, we'll need to be busy, we'll need to move quick.
If we get Europe we need to hit the ground running, can't treat the games like we do the League Cup (wrongly) as pre-season fitness builders.
Offline
Far better player with him but we can’t ignore his fitness. 1 year deal with a pay as you play extra incentive.
Offline
Conway11 wrote:
95% of the season unfit. Much much better and dependable players out there. Massive reasons he never got out the championship until 2024 at 31 years old.
Slight exaggeration with 95% is it not?
Offline
CCX2 2010 wrote:
It's a 100% yes for me, our success rating with him in the team says everything.
I agree with a lot of the points above but it's been a bit of the perfect storm or rather the not so perfect.
With Docherty injured its been magnified by a couple of facts.
(1) Sibbald injured for 6 months.
(2) Odada as a back up, clearly miles off it.
(3) Campbell, just not the player we expected from his Motherwell days. Still time though but the jury is definitely out on him.
(4) Babunski not really a 6 or an 8 having to play his role.
(5) Holt, apart from St Mirren, clearly out his depth in there.
With better recruitment and a wee bit more luck we are maybe not pushing this guy back quite as early. Take the Derby match two weeks ago for example, he is on the bench with his quad strapped up because we are so limited in ability in the middle of the pitch and he's clearly nowhere near ready to play.
Totally agree. We have to do better than Odada, Campbell and Babunski. Really frustrating with Babunski as he is a very talented player just not suited to the Scottish game. Campbell has till the end of the season to change Jim’s mind I would imagine. Odada looks a lost cause but does he not have another season. Another Watt.
Online!
Docherty as we all know is a fine player when available.
The problem his availability creates for us is a lack of consistency in midfield because we are always having to adjust when he's out and then adjust when he comes back in so it's hard to develop a fluidity and understanding.
Just another way to look at it.
Not sure where we find a better player who will play every week though. It's tough but on balance it's a no from me for Ross. But we know how this works, we release him and he's 100% fit next season, plays every game for Partick or Falkirk.
Offline
For me this is the Peter Pawlett situation all over again.
A clearly talented player who improves us when he does play, but who's body invariably lets him down and then we suffer the consequences as a team.
I would like to wait until the season's end to see if Ross could somehow put a consistent run together from now until May. I suspect, sadly, that he will be unavailable again soon and if that's the case i'm afraid it would be an easy decision for me to reluctantly let him go at the end of his contract.
CCX made a good point above about our over reliance on him due to poor recruitment in this area.
Odada
Babunski
Fiorini
Campbell
Four midfielders Goodwin's signed who he has quickly decided he can't trust. Adding in Docherty's propensity for injury has made it a situation that's been barely manageable at times and Sunday was the first time in a long, long time where our engine room felt like it had balance, control and leadership.
We need a better success rate than that going forward, recruitment wise.
Offline
Yes on peanuts, otherwise a wage better spent elsewhere on someone more reliable.