Offline
Shedtastic wrote:
What do you think Clark adds to the team?
The ability to take corner kicks & penalties.
Edit: + what Lifesanocean says
Get Pawlett away tae fuck from corners, cannae mind ae one that threatened against Hibs.
How many did we have ? 10 or more ?
Which again leaves you wondering at why Neilson and Mickey persist with his week in week out ineffectiveness.
Hope I'm proven wrong but Pawlett's no the rotating scapegoat he's cemented his position.
Last edited by Shakey Isles Arab (12/8/2020 9:47 pm)
Offline
Finn Seemann wrote:
Agreed Tek - I think I criticised him earlier but I was certainly not suggesting getting rid of him. He'll still be of use, but I think his game time needs to be less than 100%. He takes a pen. very well and is one of the older heads, but the game past him by last night and he wasn't able to assist Appere at all. He did a bit of pressing, but I don't think he is nippy enough these days to be MM's first choice for that role either. Pawlett was considerably more effective last night - which is a bit of a reversal of fortune from my perspective (and Pawlett wasn't that effective). From the games thus far its just as physical as the Championship but with fitter/stronger players which doesn't really bode well for Nicky.
Agree, but only up to a point. He's not suited to how we are now trying to play rather than being out of his depth imho. In the two games Clark has started in he has had to expend so much energy trying to press defenders as per Mellon's style (and be fair, he did this successfully several times in the first half) that he's not really had any energy left (or time and space) to do anything particularly creative. He's also playing further up the park and pressing from the front but he's never going to physically dominate or run in behind defenders whereas under Neilson he was more of a luxury being allowed to drop into pockets of space and playing clever wee one-two's to play in Shankland or midfield runners or he'd arrive in the box late unmarked to get on the end of crosses. Neilson based his whole game plan around Clark, hence why we went all to fuck when he got injured last season.
Last edited by lifesanocean (12/8/2020 9:58 pm)
Offline
lifesanocean wrote:
Finn Seemann wrote:
Agreed Tek - I think I criticised him earlier but I was certainly not suggesting getting rid of him. He'll still be of use, but I think his game time needs to be less than 100%. He takes a pen. very well and is one of the older heads, but the game past him by last night and he wasn't able to assist Appere at all. He did a bit of pressing, but I don't think he is nippy enough these days to be MM's first choice for that role either. Pawlett was considerably more effective last night - which is a bit of a reversal of fortune from my perspective (and Pawlett wasn't that effective). From the games thus far its just as physical as the Championship but with fitter/stronger players which doesn't really bode well for Nicky.
Agree, but only up to a point. He's not suited to how we are now trying to play rather than being out of his depth imho. In the two games Clark has started in he has had to expend so much energy trying to press defenders as per Mellon's style (and be fair, he did this successfully several times in the first half) that he's not really had any energy left (or time and space) to do anything particularly creative. He's also playing further up the park and pressing from the front but he's never going to physically dominate or run in behind defenders whereas under Neilson he was more of a luxury being allowed to drop into pockets of space and playing clever wee one-two's to play in Shankland or midfield runners or he'd arrive in the box late unmarked to get on the end of crosses. Neilson based his whole game plan around Clark, hence why we went all to fuck when he got injured last season.
Agree with this to be fair. Also MM is clearly wanting Harkes or Pawlett to be the provider of clever one-twos and late runs into the box which is again probably a stretch for both, for different reasons. You'd think that plays into Cammy Smith's hands but he also continues to flatter to deceive. It just gets us back to missing a Scott Allan type.
Offline
Finn Seemann wrote:
lifesanocean wrote:
Finn Seemann wrote:
Agreed Tek - I think I criticised him earlier but I was certainly not suggesting getting rid of him. He'll still be of use, but I think his game time needs to be less than 100%. He takes a pen. very well and is one of the older heads, but the game past him by last night and he wasn't able to assist Appere at all. He did a bit of pressing, but I don't think he is nippy enough these days to be MM's first choice for that role either. Pawlett was considerably more effective last night - which is a bit of a reversal of fortune from my perspective (and Pawlett wasn't that effective). From the games thus far its just as physical as the Championship but with fitter/stronger players which doesn't really bode well for Nicky.
Agree, but only up to a point. He's not suited to how we are now trying to play rather than being out of his depth imho. In the two games Clark has started in he has had to expend so much energy trying to press defenders as per Mellon's style (and be fair, he did this successfully several times in the first half) that he's not really had any energy left (or time and space) to do anything particularly creative. He's also playing further up the park and pressing from the front but he's never going to physically dominate or run in behind defenders whereas under Neilson he was more of a luxury being allowed to drop into pockets of space and playing clever wee one-two's to play in Shankland or midfield runners or he'd arrive in the box late unmarked to get on the end of crosses. Neilson based his whole game plan around Clark, hence why we went all to fuck when he got injured last season.
Agree with this to be fair. Also MM is clearly wanting Harkes or Pawlett to be the provider of clever one-twos and late runs into the box which is again probably a stretch for both, for different reasons. You'd think that plays into Cammy Smith's hands but he also continues to flatter to deceive. It just gets us back to missing a Scott Allan type.
Cammy Smith offers nothing. And that's not me being a 'boo-boy' or anything else.
He's failed to break into not just one but two different Utd sides in the Championship. And under two different Manager's who both signed him and then subsequently both put him out on loan.
He is only in and around our first team currently because the squad is paper thin in forward areas.
He needs to move on and find himself a club where he starts every week.
Offline
Tek wrote:
Finn Seemann wrote:
lifesanocean wrote:
Agree, but only up to a point. He's not suited to how we are now trying to play rather than being out of his depth imho. In the two games Clark has started in he has had to expend so much energy trying to press defenders as per Mellon's style (and be fair, he did this successfully several times in the first half) that he's not really had any energy left (or time and space) to do anything particularly creative. He's also playing further up the park and pressing from the front but he's never going to physically dominate or run in behind defenders whereas under Neilson he was more of a luxury being allowed to drop into pockets of space and playing clever wee one-two's to play in Shankland or midfield runners or he'd arrive in the box late unmarked to get on the end of crosses. Neilson based his whole game plan around Clark, hence why we went all to fuck when he got injured last season.
Agree with this to be fair. Also MM is clearly wanting Harkes or Pawlett to be the provider of clever one-twos and late runs into the box which is again probably a stretch for both, for different reasons. You'd think that plays into Cammy Smith's hands but he also continues to flatter to deceive. It just gets us back to missing a Scott Allan type.
Cammy Smith offers nothing. And that's not me being a 'boo-boy' or anything else.
He's failed to break into not just one but two different Utd sides in the Championship. And under two different Manager's who both signed him and then subsequently both put him out on loan.
He is only in and around our first team currently because the squad is paper thin in forward areas.
He needs to move on and find himself a club where he starts every week.
Unfortunately agree - not going to make it at this level.
Offline
Interesting opinions about Clark but I suppose MM's is the only one which counts and I'll wager that when we have McMullan fit Clark will be benched, MM's style of play is just not for him.
Offline
Shedtastic wrote:
Interesting opinions about Clark but I suppose MM's is the only one which counts and I'll wager that when we have McMullan fit Clark will be benched, MM's style of play is just not for him.
Not convinced - McMullan has already been replaced by Bolton. I don't think he'll get that slot back in a hurry. He may get the headless chicken player presser nod ahead of Clark, but he definitely doesn't fit the creative requirement which would be the other side of the player that MM would like to replace Clark with.
Offline
Twitter rumour today that us & Sunderland in for Graham Carey. LM, 31, with CSKA Sofia just now.
Offline
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Twitter rumour today that us & Sunderland in for Graham Carey. LM, 31, with CSKA Sofia just now.
Would be a great addition imo. Has done very well for himself since leaving Ross Co. Scores a good few from midfield too.
Offline
Mind the meltdoon when we had him on trial at left back, but jackie signed some laddie from Queens park instead...
Offline
Woody wrote:
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Twitter rumour today that us & Sunderland in for Graham Carey. LM, 31, with CSKA Sofia just now.
Would be a great addition imo. Has done very well for himself since leaving Ross Co. Scores a good few from midfield too.
Has a wicked free kick too IIRC
Offline
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Woody wrote:
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Twitter rumour today that us & Sunderland in for Graham Carey. LM, 31, with CSKA Sofia just now.
Would be a great addition imo. Has done very well for himself since leaving Ross Co. Scores a good few from midfield too.
Has a wicked free kick too IIRC
Yeah, went through a real purple patch with Plymouth a couple of years ago. Scoring, what seemed like every week, and they were either pearlers or pens
Offline
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Woody wrote:
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Twitter rumour today that us & Sunderland in for Graham Carey. LM, 31, with CSKA Sofia just now.
Would be a great addition imo. Has done very well for himself since leaving Ross Co. Scores a good few from midfield too.
Has a wicked free kick too IIRC
Then I hope we get him, cos our free kicks and corners are shocking.
Offline
Wouldn't have thought a left back was a priority.
But, yes, he's a good player.
We've been linked with him more than once though.
Offline
was a left back, but has played left mid for years now
Offline
It's long been a false notion that Jackie signed Andy Robertson as a left back in direct competition to signing Graham Carey.
Carey has rarely played in that position in his career, the vast majority of his appearances have been as an attacking player normally but not exclusively wide left. He'd be a good signing, we've few options out wide, but at his age, and still under contract, you'd think it unlikely he'd be coming to Tannadice.
Offline
Beardy23 wrote:
was a left back, but has played left mid for years now
In that case, perhaps worth a punt.
Offline
Tek wrote:
Beardy23 wrote:
was a left back, but has played left mid for years now
In that case, perhaps worth a punt.
I think in his time down South he has played on the right, left, and through the middle in the attacking midfield positions.
One thing is for sure, we dont have anyone in our squad with anything close to what he gives you from set pieces.
Last edited by LarsErikKjell (13/8/2020 3:18 pm)
LarsErikKjell wrote:
Tek wrote:
Beardy23 wrote:
was a left back, but has played left mid for years now
In that case, perhaps worth a punt.
I think in his time down South he has played on the right, left, and through the middle in the attacking midfield positions.
One thing is for sure, we dont have anyone in our squad with anything close to what he gives you from set pieces.
I see PP's on the corners this season & to be fair it's the best I've seen for a while tho that isn't saying much. NC's living on one successful free kick last season but when I see him over the ball I go, oh no!
Offline
smedDUm wrote:
LarsErikKjell wrote:
Tek wrote:
In that case, perhaps worth a punt.
I think in his time down South he has played on the right, left, and through the middle in the attacking midfield positions.
One thing is for sure, we dont have anyone in our squad with anything close to what he gives you from set pieces.
I see PP's on the corners this season & to be fair it's the best I've seen for a while tho that isn't saying much. NC's living on one successful free kick last season but when I see him over the ball I go, oh no!
Has Sporle not got a free kick about him? He's a South American at least ffs
Offline
Getting a bit concerning this. We are really struggling to score (or even create chances) and MM just keeps mentioning youngsters.
No-one expects him to make 'knee jerk' signings btw. But 6 weeks after we signed him i had hoped we would have certainly strengthened our attacking areas (or be at an advanced stage of doing so at the very least).
Offline
Tek wrote:
Getting a bit concerning this. We are really struggling to score (or even create chances) and MM just keeps mentioning youngsters.
No-one expects him to make 'knee jerk' signings btw. But 6 weeks after we signed him i had hoped we would have certainly strengthened our attacking areas (or be at an advanced stage of doing so at the very least).
Aye ye have to hope he's got one or two line up and he's just keepin schtoom till deals done
Offline
Thing is nobody really knows how much funds have been made available to MM. But I agree it would be nice to see the front end of the team being addressed.
Offline
I think we have identified who we want, we are now just waiting to see if the deals fall into place to allow them to happen. Suspect we'll be well into next month before we have completed our business.
Offline
To be balanced about signings, it's only 18 days since we were confirmed as a Premiership team, and it's possible some of the targets we were after couldn't hold off to see that outcome.