Offline
TheShed wrote:
Tek wrote:
The injury to Nicky Clark has taken the shine off of today's result somewhat.
He has been a massive player for us since his return from injury.
If he misses the rest of the season we must replace him because Neilson is clearly not going to play Sow.
And what with Cammy Smith's imminent departure we are really light up top again.
Would be Appere and Shankland up top for me unless we can get someone in, Sporle left, McMullan right, Pawlett, Stanton can fill in wide too.
Would prefer someone in tho if Clark is indeed as bad as feared. Let’s face it league’s won but going into next season with winning momentum is the important thing now.
Say Shankland get's injured between now and May (Heaven forbid), who's our No.9? Would only leave young Appere. And in his first season as a Pro it's a role he hasn't played much.
He (Neilson) isn't going to play Sow (despite his comments midweek).
We have good options all over the park now. But upfront there is no competition for LS.
Presumably Clark's wages will now be covered by Health insurance for a few months. Surely that could free up a wage to get a loanee forward in till May.
Regardless, Clark being out is a huge blow. He covers 3 positions for us and as well as his goals he brings experience, leadership qualities and assists (his corner for Shankland's header today for example).
Offline
Tek wrote:
TheShed wrote:
Tek wrote:
The injury to Nicky Clark has taken the shine off of today's result somewhat.
He has been a massive player for us since his return from injury.
If he misses the rest of the season we must replace him because Neilson is clearly not going to play Sow.
And what with Cammy Smith's imminent departure we are really light up top again.
Would be Appere and Shankland up top for me unless we can get someone in, Sporle left, McMullan right, Pawlett, Stanton can fill in wide too.
Would prefer someone in tho if Clark is indeed as bad as feared. Let’s face it league’s won but going into next season with winning momentum is the important thing now.Say Shankland get's injured between now and May (Heaven forbid), who's our No.9? Would only leave young Appere. And in his first season as a Pro it's a role he hasn't played much.
He (Neilson) isn't going to play Sow (despite his comments midweek).
We have good options all over the park now. But upfront there is no competition for LS.
Presumably Clark's wages will now be covered by Health insurance for a few months. Surely that could free up a wage to get a loanee forward in till May.
Regardless, Clark being out is a huge blow. He covers 3 positions for us and as well as his goals he brings experience, leadership qualities and assists (his corner for Shankland's header today for example).
Agree, if we can get the right man. Don’t want a panicky replacement that ends up sitting beside Sow on the bench.
Clark is a big miss, he’s pretty underrated imo.
Offline
Goals....
Offline
Arabnophobia wrote:
Goals....
Great goals. But what did "I don't think that will dispel his disappointment too much" mean of Shankland, after his booking?
Online!
PatReilly wrote:
Arabnophobia wrote:
Goals....
Great goals. But what did "I don't think that will dispel his disappointment too much" mean of Shankland, after his booking?![]()
No idea, but that booking is a fucking joke.
Offline
Arabdownsouth wrote:
PatReilly wrote:
Arabnophobia wrote:
Goals....
Great goals. But what did "I don't think that will dispel his disappointment too much" mean of Shankland, after his booking?![]()
No idea, but that booking is a fucking joke.
It’s technically correct. It’s the laws that are a fucking joke.
Offline
Jobby’s post match interview - wow.
Offline
Just watching the goals there and some very good play.
Delighted for Sporle to get a goal and his ball to Shankland is also good. Hopefully that he is now finding his feet. One thing i have noticed is the rest of the squad all speaking to him in Spanish on his instagram account and with his girlfriend here he now looks like he has eventually settled in.
Online!
TheShed wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
PatReilly wrote:
Great goals. But what did "I don't think that will dispel his disappointment too much" mean of Shankland, after his booking?![]()
No idea, but that booking is a fucking joke.
It’s technically correct. It’s the laws that are a fucking joke.
Yeah, a complete joke to get booked for lifting up his shirt to show a tee-shirt that is exactly the same fucking colour. Jumping into the crowd or ripping off his shirt altogether and nothing underneath fair enough, but a lad celebrating a perfect hat trick deserves a tiny bit of leeway ffs
Offline
Arabdownsouth wrote:
TheShed wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
No idea, but that booking is a fucking joke.
It’s technically correct. It’s the laws that are a fucking joke.
Yeah, a complete joke to get booked for lifting up his shirt to show a tee-shirt that is exactly the same fucking colour. Jumping into the crowd or ripping off his shirt altogether and nothing underneath fair enough, but a lad celebrating a perfect hat trick deserves a tiny bit of leeway ffs
Don’t think anyone should ever get booked for celebrating a goal tbh.
Online!
TheShed wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
TheShed wrote:
It’s technically correct. It’s the laws that are a fucking joke.
Yeah, a complete joke to get booked for lifting up his shirt to show a tee-shirt that is exactly the same fucking colour. Jumping into the crowd or ripping off his shirt altogether and nothing underneath fair enough, but a lad celebrating a perfect hat trick deserves a tiny bit of leeway ffs
Don’t think anyone should ever get booked for celebrating a goal tbh.
Unless it's those funny people over the road, mind you that does seem pretty far fetched 😂