Tangerine'n'Black wrote:

Was it not the case that the complainant was openly named on the BBC website ( and others ) and thereafter sought anonymity causing retrospective amendment of web pages to include Mr A ?

Yes.

The injuction was to stop the press naming him due to these counter charges being made.


 

Tangerine'n'Black wrote:

Bit of googling would appear to indicate the the complianer was named openly on 17th August but anonymity injunction caused this name to be removed more than a month later on 29th Sept 2017 from web media reports.

Maybe the court injunction says that everyone has to forget what was in the reports during that 6 week period 

 
I had forgotten to forget

Happy to forget about Mr A now