Offline
David hopkins just got Bradford job, wonder if he’ll try and take Alexander, be a blow if we lost him
Offline
I doubt Bradford would be as relaxed about employing coaches without badges as us.
Offline
Doubt it’ll happen, but if it does there’s plenty other folk out there.
Don’t think there’s anyone at the club right now who’d be missed if they left.
Offline
One of the fancied managers to replace Csaba gone.
Rocky Raccoon wrote:
I doubt Bradford would be as relaxed about employing coaches without badges as us.
I think you're right RR.
Offline
kdyteejay wrote:
One of the fancied managers to replace Csaba gone.
Could've had him In the summer...
Offline
kdyteejay wrote:
One of the fancied managers to replace Csaba gone.
Though style of football at Livi was not easy on the eye that was a team that you could see gave everything for the manager and followed his plan and instructions to the letter
Great achievement by Hopkin with double promotion with Livi. Another decent contender to replace our clueless manager gone!
Offline
LS Arab wrote:
kdyteejay wrote:
One of the fancied managers to replace Csaba gone.
Though style of football at Livi was not easy on the eye that was a team that you could see gave everything for the manager and followed his plan and instructions to the letter
Great achievement by Hopkin with double promotion with Livi. Another decent contender to replace our clueless manager gone!
This "easy on the eye" thing is in the eyes of the beholder. Csaba thinks his tippy tappy stuff is easy on the eye - I think its turgid and a big turn off. I think watching players that give everything for the manager/club/fans is easy on the eye (it is on mine at least) and I'd imagine following a club that achieved back to back promotions must have scored enough goals to win games and that too would be easy on my eyes. Hopkins was a missed opportunity.
Did you see the Spurs goalie putting the ball out for a corner from a goal kick?
Tippy tappy surrounds us.
Offline
I’ll never understand why folk have a preferred style of play.
As a coach your preferred style should always be the way that suits your players to get the best out of them, particularly your best players, and ensures wins. This style will be different for every group of players.
As a supporter your preferred style should be the one that gives you 3 points most weeks, that’s all that really matters.
Offline
TheShed wrote:
I’ll never understand why folk have a preferred style of play.
As a coach your preferred style should always be the way that suits your players to get the best out of them, particularly your best players, and ensures wins. This style will be different for every group of players.
As a supporter your preferred style should be the one that gives you 3 points most weeks, that’s all that really matters.
Very good post.
PatReilly wrote:
TheShed wrote:
I’ll never understand why folk have a preferred style of play.
As a coach your preferred style should always be the way that suits your players to get the best out of them, particularly your best players, and ensures wins. This style will be different for every group of players.
As a supporter your preferred style should be the one that gives you 3 points most weeks, that’s all that really matters.Very good post.
And the style of play can change a dozen times a game.
The default style of play? If we have the ball they don't.
The obsession with formations is all down to Sky Sports & guff football.
The first formation I witnessed at Tannadice was 2-3-5 & the game's the same today.