Tek wrote:

Andy wrote:

Tek wrote:

Matty Smith ain't a forward imo.

Infact if anything i see him as more of a wide player who likes to get to the bye-line (albeit I've only seen the boy play 3 times).
 

Matty Smith is a forward, thats his position.

People can question the quality of our strikers but we've got four, three just signed and one promoted from the devs and I can't see us adding any more.

The injuries up front have been really unlucky so far but we only play one up top so will be well covered, in numbers anyway.
 

People used to say Dow was a striker.

He wasn't either.
 

 
Never heard anyone say Dow was a striker, but regardless, I'm not sure why you've got a hard on for Matty Smith not being a striker?

blackandtangerine wrote:

Tek wrote:

Andy wrote:

Matty Smith is a forward, thats his position.

People can question the quality of our strikers but we've got four, three just signed and one promoted from the devs and I can't see us adding any more.

The injuries up front have been really unlucky so far but we only play one up top so will be well covered, in numbers anyway.
 

People used to say Dow was a striker.

He wasn't either.
 

Never heard anyone say dow was a striker.
 

I did.


 

No chance we will get sibbald with the amount of development fee

First I heard Smith was a striker was when we had to throw him up top last week, I always thought he was a winger.



I long for the day when United players are not Jack of all trades and masters of none.

If we are after a midfielder does that suggest that Fraser might be going given  a move has been rumoured before, we're not exactly light in that department and he will be one of the few who could command a transfer fee, Seems a strange priority (to sign a midfielder) otherwise.

 

Andy wrote:

Tek wrote:

Andy wrote:

 
Never heard anyone say Dow was a striker, but regardless, I'm not sure why you've got a hard on for Matty Smith not being a striker?

'hard-on'?

Just an observation on what I've seen from him thus far.


 

 
It's not just an observation though, you're snidely stating that there were people who said that Dow was a striker and they were wrong, likewise by me stating that Matty Smith is a striker I am wrong.

It's really not import and it's derailed the thread but regardless of what you think, and even what type of player he may become in the future, today - Matty Smith is 100% a forward.

That's not my opinion, that's his history as a footballer and where his manager thinks he will play for United so I'll leave it at that.

Haha snide?I'm only stating my opinion Andy.

Back when i posted on Mad (remember that? 😉) i would often decry our lack of strikers and towards the end of every window would always say we need another Striker to which someone (and more than one person too) would always pipe up with 'i think we have adequate cover with Ryan Dow,Jordan Moore etc'.

It would frustrate me because i never from day one seen him as one.

I will be surprised if Smith plays as a lone Striker or even as a part of a front two partnership for Utd too often unless injury dictates otherwise.

I just have a feeling he will feature more in the attacking 3 of a 4231 or as a winger or what have you.

Though that's all it is 'a feeling'.
 

shedboy wrote:

Apparently its Fyvie.  until his other voice in his head tells him no.

We are the only club he ever wanted to join
 

O/T Tek aboot that thread on Mad (which I don't read much), but I read this coz I mind oe it, esp. aboot the raid on the boozer. Ane oe the things I remember aboot it IIRC, was that I dinna think any photaes oe the accused were ever printed/published in the press or media.

The boyo's no haverin, but he's been a bit oe a silly b*ggar puting on a futba forum - Footymad, of ah places.

The Clown is claiming he got hit on the napper... would explain a lot

BigAndyFTD wrote:

Fae what I've heard as recently as the weekend is that there is still strong interest in Fraser and the laddie wants to go (already kent that) RM desperate ti keep.
and that the boy Woods fae County is a player that McKinnon rates, ti be honest eh dina ken much aboot um so no going to comment.

Any idea who the interested party/ies are for Fraser?
 

shedboy wrote:

sheikhutahaboot wrote:

shedboy wrote:

And speaking for myself totally under used 😟

is that the word or your actual hard on?

 
Both

.......same......