Offline
Not sure as not an accountant but it appears the charges taken against the club have all been satisfies, according to companies house.
WeeDude_83 wrote:
Not sure as not an accountant but it appears the charges taken against the club have all been satisfies, according to companies house.
Certainly seems that way.
1)Could be that it was working capital that wasn't required, either all or on part.
2)Might be the loan term was up or close to up and monies have been found (season ticket sales most likely) to pay it off.
3)Could be there's a different loan or change to the terms of the loan and the details have still to be listed at companies house.
My bet is a bit of 1&2 but that's just pure speculation on my part - so probably wrong
Offline
If you look properly it appears the charges have been made twice and this is one of them getting paid back. Someone made a cunt of it???
HeggyHandshake wrote:
If you look properly it appears the charges have been made twice and this is one of them getting paid back. Someone made a cunt of it???
Quite right 😳
Missed charges 16 through 19
Funnily enough I was walking home tonight thinking this is too good to be true - and it was.
Offline
DUFC 2017 mate