Tekel Towers - DUFC Fans Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



21/10/2014 6:33 am  #51


Re: lukaz zaluska

WTF is going on here then?

This is all news to me.

Is it Wilson, Erskine and Graham in the pic with polis?  And Pates lamped Zaluska and is in the meat wagon?

And they were all out for big Fojut's birthday?

Scenes.

 

21/10/2014 7:38 am  #52


Re: lukaz zaluska

It seems that the photo is Wilson, Zaluska and Jim Goodwin.

Reports (from various places) is that Zaluska assaulted by one player who hit him a few times then another player hit him again whilst he was concussed knocking him out before fleeing in a taxi


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

21/10/2014 8:46 am  #53


Re: lukaz zaluska

Seen one well known football website online saying the second perpetrator was a Goalie.

 

21/10/2014 9:06 am  #54


Re: lukaz zaluska

What's the scoop TEK?

 

21/10/2014 9:10 am  #55


Re: lukaz zaluska

so we've got a keeper...fojut, paton,dougie imrie, jim goodwin, mark wilson, chris erskine, Brian Graham ,zaluska, zaluska's bird, the lad mckinnon, a killie player...a Dumbarton player,

any mair on zaluska gate ?

 

21/10/2014 11:33 am  #56


Re: lukaz zaluska

Really didn't think we would have anyone involved in this one. Bugger!

 

21/10/2014 11:52 am  #57


Re: lukaz zaluska

Andľy wrote:

What's the scoop TEK?

Dunno bud.Just read that the guy who landed the knockout blow as it were,was a fellow goalkeeper.

Who knows whit the actual truth is.

There's that many rumours now.

 

21/10/2014 12:33 pm  #58


Re: lukaz zaluska

Sounds like a certain goalie we know.

 

21/10/2014 2:25 pm  #59


Re: lukaz zaluska

Can't think of anything more stupid than assaulting someone who plays for Celtic or Sevco.

You'll never be able to go out again


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

21/10/2014 4:33 pm  #60


Re: lukaz zaluska

Turning into 'who shot JR'

 

21/10/2014 6:17 pm  #61


Re: lukaz zaluska

Paton and fellow Arabs exonerated by Columbo McNammara 


Hear their shout, hear their roar
They've probably had a barrel of ale and much, much more
Hooray, hooray, hooray, yeah
Over the hill went the swords of a thousand men
 

21/10/2014 6:30 pm  #62


Re: lukaz zaluska

What did JMac say Saint Obz?

 

21/10/2014 6:40 pm  #63


Re: lukaz zaluska

Duplicate.

Last edited by Andy (21/10/2014 6:42 pm)

 

21/10/2014 6:42 pm  #64


Re: lukaz zaluska

Big Fojut just tweeted this...

I have spent last sunday evening with my family in Dundee in my house watching polish football Just to make it clear

 

21/10/2014 7:54 pm  #65


Re: lukaz zaluska

Hero.

 

21/10/2014 7:58 pm  #66


Re: lukaz zaluska

RogerTheAlien wrote:

Hero.

I'll second this.
 

 

21/10/2014 8:00 pm  #67


Re: lukaz zaluska

TEK wrote:

What did JMac say Saint Obz?

 
He said along the lines of this in defence of his player/s on North Tonight Tek

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29712016


Hear their shout, hear their roar
They've probably had a barrel of ale and much, much more
Hooray, hooray, hooray, yeah
Over the hill went the swords of a thousand men
 

21/10/2014 8:04 pm  #68


Re: lukaz zaluska


Hear their shout, hear their roar
They've probably had a barrel of ale and much, much more
Hooray, hooray, hooray, yeah
Over the hill went the swords of a thousand men
 

21/10/2014 8:10 pm  #69


Re: lukaz zaluska

St Obswell wrote:

TEK wrote:

What did JMac say Saint Obz?

 
He said along the lines of this in defence of his player/s on North Tonight Tek

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29712016

I saw that article earlier mate.

Doesn't really 'exonerate' paton though does it?

Just says that his work rate and application ON THE PITCH is the benchmark for other players.

All this could be nipped in the bud tonight if Paton took to Twitter to make a Fojut like post.


 

 

21/10/2014 8:10 pm  #70


Re: lukaz zaluska

I say no one's guilty of anything in this Country until proven otherwise after digesting the feedback back from a thread on this the other week in relation to Kris Boyd. Nuff said 


Hear their shout, hear their roar
They've probably had a barrel of ale and much, much more
Hooray, hooray, hooray, yeah
Over the hill went the swords of a thousand men
 

21/10/2014 8:15 pm  #71


Re: lukaz zaluska

TEK wrote:

St Obswell wrote:

TEK wrote:

What did JMac say Saint Obz?

 
He said along the lines of this in defence of his player/s on North Tonight Tek

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/29712016

I saw that article earlier mate.

Doesn't really 'exonerate' paton though does it?

Just says that his work rate and application ON THE PITCH is the benchmark for other players.

All this could be nipped in the bud tonight if Paton took to Twitter to make a Fojut like post.


 

 
Agree but couldn't imagine United incriminating one of thier own before proven guilty and can only imagine the player's been advised likewise 


Hear their shout, hear their roar
They've probably had a barrel of ale and much, much more
Hooray, hooray, hooray, yeah
Over the hill went the swords of a thousand men
 

21/10/2014 8:22 pm  #72


Re: lukaz zaluska

Of course they wouldn't want to incriminate him mate.

But in light of fevered specualtion it would be advisable for either Paton or Utd to make some kind of a statement if he's not involved in anyway.

The Newspaper with the biggest circulation in the country was today basically incriminating at least one Utd player (maybe two) with being involved in a serious assault.

Not good.And quite surprised the club haven't acted on that in some way today.

Perhaps for legal reasons they can't,of course.

 

 

21/10/2014 8:56 pm  #73


Re: lukaz zaluska

St Obswell wrote:

The Cellic say this:

http://www.celticquicknews.co.uk/?p=16245

That article is misleading. They are going on about Paton and Fojut mentioning Zaluska in a tweet after they got beat from Legia. 
 


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

21/10/2014 8:57 pm  #74


Re: lukaz zaluska

TEK wrote:

Of course they wouldn't want to incriminate him mate.

But in light of fevered specualtion it would be advisable for either Paton or Utd to make some kind of a statement if he's not involved in anyway.

The Newspaper with the biggest circulation in the country was today basically incriminating at least one Utd player (maybe two) with being involved in a serious assault.

Not good.And quite surprised the club haven't acted on that in some way today.

Perhaps for legal reasons they can't,of course.

 

I actually think United have done the right thing. IF one of our players are responsible they need to wait until the player is charged etc. Pretty sure IF someone is involved they will have taken legal advice tbh
 


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

21/10/2014 9:10 pm  #75


Re: lukaz zaluska

It's all getting a bit Cluedo like now isn't it?

I was hoping that by Fojut tweeting might have indicated that no United player was involved.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum