Offline
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Never seen anything worse than 'what a load of shite'
Well you must have missed all the fun.
Offline
Edmond Dantes wrote:
PatReilly wrote:
I hold the view that if Tek is the only person moderating the forum he set up, then he is allowed to be autocratic or dictatorial if he wishes.
I hold the view that that is wrong
And of course, you are entitled to that view. I'd be interested to know why you think Tek should allow folk to write in a manner with which he, as the person responsible, might not be comfortable.
But not that interested, mind you.
Last edited by PatReilly (19/2/2017 10:54 pm)
Offline
Tek wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Never seen anything worse than 'what a load of shite'
Well you must have missed all the fun.
Shame that.
Offline
PatReilly wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
PatReilly wrote:
I hold the view that if Tek is the only person moderating the forum he set up, then he is allowed to be autocratic or dictatorial if he wishes.
I hold the view that that is wrong
And of course, you are entitled to that view. I'd be interested to know why you think Tek should allow folk to write in a manner with which he, as the person responsible, might not be comfortable.
But not that interested, mid you.
I think that's self explanatory Pat-one man's opinion isn't another man's.
but this statement from you
'then he is allowed to be autocratic or dictatorial if he wishes'
means a forum ,this forum is worthless and pointless.
Offline
Come on Ed.
So Tek puts the fut doon a wee bit - it's his baby, he can run it anyway he likes. In the end, if any of us, me included, dinna like his rules, then he can tell us to phuck off in his usual polite manner. He's no banning different opinions or opposing views - that would be pointless - he's just no wanting fowk at each other's throats - figuratively speaking.
Offline
Billy_Hainey wrote:
Come on Ed.
So Tek puts the fut doon a wee bit - it's his baby, he can run it anyway he likes. In the end, if any of us, me included, dinna like his rules, then he can tell us to phuck off in his usual polite manner. He's no banning different opinions or opposing views - that would be pointless - he's just no wanting fowk at each other's throats - figuratively speaking.
Thank you Bill.
Offline
I haven't seen Tek stifle any discussion or expression of opinions, but a series of posts can take a direction where civil wrongs/false allegations are involved: Tek could then be drawn into a legal situation whicch he wouldn't welcome.
I've seen posts on here, not many right enough, accusing Thompson of criminality. That really shouldn't be something which Tek has to deal with, should it?
However, I accept your point, Edmond, of the spirit of a forum. By its very nature, opposing points have to be allowed, otherwise there is no point in attempting discussion.
Offline
Tek wrote:
Billy_Hainey wrote:
Come on Ed.
So Tek puts the fut doon a wee bit - it's his baby, he can run it anyway he likes. In the end, if any of us, me included, dinna like his rules, then he can tell us to phuck off in his usual polite manner. He's no banning different opinions or opposing views - that would be pointless - he's just no wanting fowk at each other's throats - figuratively speaking.Thank you Bill.
It's a pity that a political line that is completely enthused on this board doesn't piss me off but it does.
but that's OK.
Last edited by Edmond Dantes (19/2/2017 11:14 pm)
Offline
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Tek wrote:
Billy_Hainey wrote:
Come on Ed.
So Tek puts the fut doon a wee bit - it's his baby, he can run it anyway he likes. In the end, if any of us, me included, dinna like his rules, then he can tell us to phuck off in his usual polite manner. He's no banning different opinions or opposing views - that would be pointless - he's just no wanting fowk at each other's throats - figuratively speaking.Thank you Bill.
It's a pity that a political line that is completely enthused on this board doesn't piss me off but it does.
but that's OK.
You've lost me.
Offline
Tek wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Tek wrote:
Thank you Bill.It's a pity that a political line that is completely enthused on this board doesn't piss me off but it does.
but that's OK.
You've lost me.
I'm not explaining.
Offline
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Tek wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
It's a pity that a political line that is completely enthused on this board doesn't piss me off but it does.
but that's OK.
You've lost me.
I'm not explaining.
Kind of negates your 'point' then.
Offline
Tek wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Tek wrote:
You've lost me.
I'm not explaining.
Kind of negates your 'point' then.
Just give me a 1 strike first banning thingy
to soothe your ego
Last edited by Edmond Dantes (19/2/2017 11:37 pm)
Offline
Any chance of locking this thread too?
Offline
Edmond Dantes wrote:
Tek wrote:
Edmond Dantes wrote:
I'm not explaining.
Kind of negates your 'point' then.
Just give me a 1 strike first banning thingy
to soothe your ego
You're embarrassing yourself now Edmond.
Goodnight.
Offline
TheShed wrote:
Any chance of locking this thread too?
Terrific idea.