Offline
Tangy wrote:
So a question for those who don't agree with my post re: Southern and Spencey...
Other than the pantomime baddies, who else's wages/responsibilities have you researched and what was your findings? I presume everybody else at the club in a non-playing capacity are deemed to be working hard and worth their money.
2nd question- im not part of the inner circle and haven't seen the results of any investigation into the roles and responsibilities of southern and spence - so could you tell me what they do for their money? 40k has also been bandied about as how much spence has been paid - where did this come from?
I'm all for excessive cost cutting allowing further investment in the playing squad - so convince me they aren't required.
Pantomime baddies, haha
I already questioned why every job wasn't looked at.
The reason these 2 get looked at is obvious, Southern does The job ST used to do and is an extra body that doesn't appear to be necessary when ST is still there. Add in that the position attracts a very healthy wage it's obvious people are going to question the need for him as opposed to a centre forward on the same wage.
Surprisingly Spence gets looked at for similar reasons of being an extra cost that was and is completely unnecessary when there are people already at the club who could have engaged with the support has much Spence has done. He was full of promises but I can't see that he's done anything but have a couple of q and a's that anyone could organise at the club and argue with fans on twitter. Where's his battle bus he kept going on about? And why does he only appear when season tickets go on sale? I've no idea what he's been paid, but whatever it is could have went towards a winger.
My question if Spence is worth a doubling of wages what is it he has done to deserve this?
And If this was a job beyond those employed at Tannadice as u suggest surely that proves the club don't have the right people in the boardroom?
Btw I'm not part of any inner circle, if one exists, not in the Fed or AT never have been, I'm just concerned at the way the club has been run last few years and think every possibe resource should be used to get us back up. I don't believe it is that's all.
FWIW I believe Ray is doing a great job with what he's got, but he's being short changed imo.
Offline
Tangy wrote:
So a question for those who don't agree with my post re: Southern and Spencey...
Other than the pantomime baddies, who else's wages/responsibilities have you researched and what was your findings? I presume everybody else at the club in a non-playing capacity are deemed to be working hard and worth their money.
2nd question- im not part of the inner circle and haven't seen the results of any investigation into the roles and responsibilities of southern and spence - so could you tell me what they do for their money? 40k has also been bandied about as how much spence has been paid - where did this come from?
I'm all for excessive cost cutting allowing further investment in the playing squad - so convince me they aren't required.
Tangy.. On Jim Spence..he was brought in to try and help with building bridges between thr club and fans.. As i said yesterday do you or have you read his twitter? I dont know anyone who things this has worked. The club already had at the time of him jumping on board a media team and associate directors and a general manager who could have tried to solve matters instead he has caused uproar with fans a good few times on twitter.
Southern... The arguement many people have is why do we need a general manager when we didnt have one for X amount of years but all of a sudden the need was there to bring one in..
The 2 salaries paid to them appears to split opinion on fans as many think they are not needed and many they are. Id imagine if we seen a list of job titles in tannadice it would surprise alot of people thr amount of staff in the place.
Offline
Beharder wrote:
This is the kind of response that is more suited to other forums. Abusing posters you dont share your opinion is not what I want to read.
Wheres the abuse?
Offline
PatReilly wrote:
Although unsure exactly what some of the folk behind the scenes do, none of them are directly to blame for our first defeat in months. I don't think there's anyone abusing other posters here, unless, Spencey and DS post here.
Thank fuck we have had a relatively successful second half on 2016.
No ones said they were responsible for our first defeat in months, its being questioned as to what they bring to the club and could / should their wages be spent on new players.
Defo no one abusing anyone, if beharder thinks thats abuse then wow, just wow, i hope he sits in the glass boxes at the games where no one uses bad words or shouts bad things that can hurt his poor little feelings
Poor wee soul
Offline
Beharder wrote:
As someone who is not against the chairman the footnote in the post is abusing an alternative point of view.
ha ha ha ha fuck off, now theres abuse for you!
Offline
Tangy wrote:
So a question for those who don't agree with my post re: Southern and Spencey...
Other than the pantomime baddies, who else's wages/responsibilities have you researched and what was your findings? I presume everybody else at the club in a non-playing capacity are deemed to be working hard and worth their money.
2nd question- im not part of the inner circle and haven't seen the results of any investigation into the roles and responsibilities of southern and spence - so could you tell me what they do for their money? 40k has also been bandied about as how much spence has been paid - where did this come from?
I'm all for excessive cost cutting allowing further investment in the playing squad - so convince me they aren't required.
The reason Southern and Spence are always brought up is due to the fact these made up positions never existed in our club until recently Tangy so why the need to create them and is it something we really really need? We never ever had a 'general manager' or a 'consultant'.
No one outwith the club really know what their R's and R's are thats what WE are asking. What do they do? Looks to alot that the wages can be better spent. Do we need these guys in these positions in the championship?
No one needs to convince you if we need them or not, the majority need convincing as its always brought up on various message boards and social medial and the one person that can tell us what they do is ST, which aint gonna happen sadly....
Offline
TheShed wrote:
Tangy wrote:
So a question for those who don't agree with my post re: Southern and Spencey...
Other than the pantomime baddies, who else's wages/responsibilities have you researched and what was your findings? I presume everybody else at the club in a non-playing capacity are deemed to be working hard and worth their money.
2nd question- im not part of the inner circle and haven't seen the results of any investigation into the roles and responsibilities of southern and spence - so could you tell me what they do for their money? 40k has also been bandied about as how much spence has been paid - where did this come from?
I'm all for excessive cost cutting allowing further investment in the playing squad - so convince me they aren't required.
Pantomime baddies, haha
I already questioned why every job wasn't looked at.
The reason these 2 get looked at is obvious, Southern does The job ST used to do and is an extra body that doesn't appear to be necessary when ST is still there. Add in that the position attracts a very healthy wage it's obvious people are going to question the need for him as opposed to a centre forward on the same wage.
Surprisingly Spence gets looked at for similar reasons of being an extra cost that was and is completely unnecessary when there are people already at the club who could have engaged with the support has much Spence has done. He was full of promises but I can't see that he's done anything but have a couple of q and a's that anyone could organise at the club and argue with fans on twitter. Where's his battle bus he kept going on about? And why does he only appear when season tickets go on sale? I've no idea what he's been paid, but whatever it is could have went towards a winger.
My question if Spence is worth a doubling of wages what is it he has done to deserve this?
And If this was a job beyond those employed at Tannadice as u suggest surely that proves the club don't have the right people in the boardroom?
Btw I'm not part of any inner circle, if one exists, not in the Fed or AT never have been, I'm just concerned at the way the club has been run last few years and think every possibe resource should be used to get us back up. I don't believe it is that's all.
FWIW I believe Ray is doing a great job with what he's got, but he's being short changed imo.
Good post
Offline
Affshore wrote:
Beharder wrote:
As someone who is not against the chairman the footnote in the post is abusing an alternative point of view.
ha ha ha ha fuck off, now theres abuse for you!
Youve got me there. That really hurt my feelings. A bit of counselling and stress management should sèe me ok for Easter Road
Offline
Beharder wrote:
Affshore wrote:
Beharder wrote:
As someone who is not against the chairman the footnote in the post is abusing an alternative point of view.
ha ha ha ha fuck off, now theres abuse for you!
Youve got me there. That really hurt my feelings. A bit of counselling and stress management should sèe me ok for Easter Road
Well if my original post was deemed 'abusive' or my 'signature' was abusive then yes, yes, you'll need some counselling, stress management wont be required, just a bit of 'man the fuck up' tablets to take.
Offline
Spence will be on absolute sweetie money, if it's worrying about saving the club money everyone is talking about I'd worry more about giving McKinnon more money to spend.
He tightened up positions we needed but left out a striker, whither it was because nobody he looked at was good enough maybe but that still doesn't hide the fact a club as big as Dundee United only has one striker on its books.
He overloaded the #10 position -
Smith
VdV
Andreu
If business was done with Andreu earlier would the other two even have got a look in at United?
Two wages wasted IMO.
The less said about Tope Obadeyi the better.
Disastrous signing.
70k for Lewis fucking Toshney.
Disastrous signing MkII
Stuart Murdoch looked like a good signing but cannot displace a player who was already here, surely McKinnon should have had a better look at his squad before strengthening positions where is was possibly not needed.
Bell, Flood, Edjenguele have all been fantastic signings, VdS has been good when played in his natural position and not CH where McKinnon actually bought him to play in, thus making the Toshney signing even worse.
Just a wee rant that has been building up over.
Sign a wide player & striker and hopefully never see Donaldson and Toshney in tangerine again and I'll be delighted.
Offline
Im shaking that much affshore ive just spilled my chardonnay all over my best flannels these tablets you subscribed will need to be strong
Offline
Add Spittal to my list along with Donaldson and Toshney, total passenger.
Offline
Rocky Raccoon wrote:
Spence will be on absolute sweetie money, if it's worrying about saving the club money everyone is talking about I'd worry more about giving McKinnon more money to spend.
He tightened up positions we needed but left out a striker, whither it was because nobody he looked at was good enough maybe but that still doesn't hide the fact a club as big as Dundee United only has one striker on its books.
He overloaded the #10 position -
Smith
VdV
Andreu
If business was done with Andreu earlier would the other two even have got a look in at United?
Two wages wasted IMO.
The less said about Tope Obadeyi the better.
Disastrous signing.
70k for Lewis fucking Toshney.
Disastrous signing MkII
Stuart Murdoch looked like a good signing but cannot displace a player who was already here, surely McKinnon should have had a better look at his squad before strengthening positions where is was possibly not needed.
Bell, Flood, Edjenguele have all been fantastic signings, VdS has been good when played in his natural position and not CH where McKinnon actually bought him to play in, thus making the Toshney signing even worse.
Just a wee rant that has been building up over.
Sign a wide player & striker and hopefully never see Donaldson and Toshney in tangerine again and I'll be delighted.
Most are in agreement that Ray is at fault for having one striker and too many for other positions balance of squad is not good as has been highlightef many times from posters the past few months. The need for a striker or 2 is that desperate it should have been lined up to go asap from the window opening. Jim Spence and Colin Stewart both said we need to move players before bringing players in so if ray wants to punt boys they should be away now whether thats a mutual termination or not we need things ti happen.
Offline
Beharder wrote:
Im shaking that much affshore ive just spilled my chardonnay all over my best flannels these tablets you subscribed will need to be strong
They are, they will dilute anything you deem abusive for your poor wee soul
Offline
Rocky Raccoon wrote:
Spence will be on absolute sweetie money, if it's worrying about saving the club money everyone is talking about I'd worry more about giving McKinnon more money to spend.
He tightened up positions we needed but left out a striker, whither it was because nobody he looked at was good enough maybe but that still doesn't hide the fact a club as big as Dundee United only has one striker on its books.
He overloaded the #10 position -
Smith
VdV
Andreu
If business was done with Andreu earlier would the other two even have got a look in at United?
Two wages wasted IMO.
The less said about Tope Obadeyi the better.
Disastrous signing.
70k for Lewis fucking Toshney.
Disastrous signing MkII
Stuart Murdoch looked like a good signing but cannot displace a player who was already here, surely McKinnon should have had a better look at his squad before strengthening positions where is was possibly not needed.
Bell, Flood, Edjenguele have all been fantastic signings, VdS has been good when played in his natural position and not CH where McKinnon actually bought him to play in, thus making the Toshney signing even worse.
Just a wee rant that has been building up over.
Sign a wide player & striker and hopefully never see Donaldson and Toshney in tangerine again and I'll be delighted.
Hard to disagree with any of this but what i will say in Rays defence is that he never knew Andreu was gonna become available until after we had secured VdV and Smith.
Offline
Much of Rocky Racoon's assessment I'd agree with, and as Affshore says, the Andreu signing was a late opportunity we couldn't turn down. Obadayi might be a better player with more forward options, just like Murray. Toshney's not a right back, but I think has been used there as he gets up and down the right side as we have no wingers. Yes, so some players have disappointed.
But see even having a pile more money freed up, it may not guarantee a league win. Hibs are only 1 point ahead of us, courtesy of a victory goal scored 3 minutes from the end of their match by an emergency loan player on a five figure per week wage. If it's all about money, they would be out of sight by now.
Only my opinion, but we are in a far better position than I guess most fans expected before this season started. In the summer the club looked destined for a long spell in the doldrums.
However, I understand fan frustration as well. We are obviously looking for the best we can get, and the team, while getting results has been badly unbalanced for much of the time. Sticking my neck out, even if we don't move anyone on, a striker and a wide player will come in.
Last edited by PatReilly (02/1/2017 1:03 pm)
Offline
The return of Affshore Arab to TT i see 🙈
Offline
Tek wrote:
The return of Affshore Arab to TT i see 🙈
Hes bullying people TEK
Offline
Beharder wrote:
Tek wrote:
The return of Affshore Arab to TT i see 🙈
Hes bullying people TEK
Offline
Beharder wrote:
Tek wrote:
The return of Affshore Arab to TT i see 🙈
Hes bullying people TEK
It's only a messageboard mate.
Learnt awhile back not to try and take them too seriously.
If Offshore was being really offensive he would be banned in a heartbeat,I'm sure he knows that (same as anyone else).
But a certain amount of back and forth is acceptable.This isn't a Women's Institute Forum afterall.
That said,everyone should always try to get their point across in a constructive manner.
Offline
Affshore wrote:
Tangy wrote:
So a question for those who don't agree with my post re: Southern and Spencey...
Other than the pantomime baddies, who else's wages/responsibilities have you researched and what was your findings? I presume everybody else at the club in a non-playing capacity are deemed to be working hard and worth their money.
2nd question- im not part of the inner circle and haven't seen the results of any investigation into the roles and responsibilities of southern and spence - so could you tell me what they do for their money? 40k has also been bandied about as how much spence has been paid - where did this come from?
I'm all for excessive cost cutting allowing further investment in the playing squad - so convince me they aren't required.The reason Southern and Spence are always brought up is due to the fact these made up positions never existed in our club until recently Tangy so why the need to create them and is it something we really really need? We never ever had a 'general manager' or a 'consultant'.
No one outwith the club really know what their R's and R's are thats what WE are asking. What do they do? Looks to alot that the wages can be better spent. Do we need these guys in these positions in the championship?
No one needs to convince you if we need them or not, the majority need convincing as its always brought up on various message boards and social medial and the one person that can tell us what they do is ST, which aint gonna happen sadly....
OK dokes. So you don't know what he does but you want rid.
I know where you are coming from but if you wanted the club to cut back to a championship level operation then there's a he'll of a lot to be cut back. St Andrews would be gone straight off. Development squad decimated. Coaching staff cut to a minimum and we really struggle to attract big players. You think we'd get tony andreu if we we'd cut the above?
We needed a balance and the chairman hasn't done a bad job in all honesty (though I can see things that could be done better)
With regards to southern position, I don't know either but I'm going to guess that part of his job is to cover the role of spence anderson of secretary? I am not sure the position has been replaced? I'd also guess he is working hard on the business side of things - looking for investment and various money making schemes. For instance, who negotiated the mcewan fraser deal?
The impression I get from many who don't like southern being involved is that they presume he is strutting about tannadice using tenners to light cigars.
Do you know the going rate for the position out of interest?
*note - on companies house, Andrew fraser is the company secretary but I've never heard of him
Last edited by Tangy (03/1/2017 12:06 am)
One defeat and the old ST & DS chestnuts come out again. Not to mention Spence. I've no idea what these guys are getting paid and I'd bet no-one on here does either. Neither can anyone really say with any certainty what their remit is. It's naive to think they are stealing a wage just because the outcomes of their actions aren't immediately obvious. They are not playing staff.
Some folk just love to moan and can't wait to get on their soapbox. It's funny how Affshore's return coincides with a poor defeat.
Offline
Tangy.. The club brought in 3 staff to cover spence anderson when he left and southern wasnt one of them if i remember correctly.
The club are tied into a contract at standrews which they seamingly looked at getting out of in the summer im not sure hiw much is spent on it but ive said it for a while we should have a facility in Dundee.
The main problem and has been for a while the money being wasted by the club rather than be reinvested.
Gussie park for instance was the worst one ST wanted thr glory for that
Offline
Goodie Conway 2 wrote:
One defeat and the old ST & DS chestnuts come out again. Not to mention Spence. I've no idea what these guys are getting paid and I'd bet no-one on here does either. Neither can anyone really say with any certainty what their remit is. It's naive to think they are stealing a wage just because the outcomes of their actions aren't immediately obvious. They are not playing staff.
Some folk just love to moan and can't wait to get on their soapbox. It's funny how Affshore's return coincides with a poor defeat.
Hardly after a defeat all have been mentioned in the past few months after wins whether its here mad social media or the pub. Nothing has changed no even 14 unbeaten id want them to stay.
Last edited by bowers (03/1/2017 10:02 am)
Probably the most important win this season has been Hibs at Tannadice, a six-pointer.
Simon Murray came on for VdV on 68 mins.
On 73 mins we scored the winning goal from a penalty.
The game was going nowhere, they'd missed a penalty and a goalless draw looked likely.
Anyone remember?