Tekel Towers - DUFC Fans Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



24/9/2016 10:27 pm  #1


Aberdeen v Sevco

Bloodbath please.

 

24/9/2016 11:19 pm  #2


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Tek wrote:

Bloodbath please.

It'll be a farce. Ref: C. Thomson.
 

 

25/9/2016 12:03 pm  #3


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Worse than I thought - John Beaton.

 

25/9/2016 1:52 pm  #4


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

PatReilly wrote:

Worse than I thought - John Beaton.

 
Free kick.  Mmmmmm?

Maddison thinks he's Blair Spittal, though.   


A' hes eggs are double yoakit!
 

25/9/2016 1:58 pm  #5


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

What was Warburtons broon braed bumping his gums aboot?

 

25/9/2016 2:09 pm  #6


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

A real sickener that for The Rangers.

Delightful.

     Thread Starter
 

25/9/2016 2:11 pm  #7


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Some goal for the winner



 
 

25/9/2016 2:24 pm  #8


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Mibbee it was Warburton that put the boot inta the team bus.

 

25/9/2016 5:11 pm  #9


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Was up in Aberdoom today at the beach ball room came out no long after the game and was delighted to see a zombie bus with 50 odd zombies either pishing and drinking just before portletham in a lay by. twa cars behind me was the polis. Cue the blues and twos and a nice easy fining mission for the boys in blue 😂😂😂💀💀💀💀💀

 

25/9/2016 9:27 pm  #10


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Sevconians showing 'admirable restraint' in defeat.

http://youtu.be/_WIKOHuJIQ4

     Thread Starter
 

27/9/2016 12:43 pm  #11


Re: Aberdeen v Sevco

Relative to the match, a lot of coverage has been given to the free kick given by Beaton in the final stages. 

Same ref sent Dixon off two weeks before for a similar challenge (and second booking), where many thought he (too?) had 'got the ball'. Think Beaton had an even better view of the Pittodrie foul, and it was explained to me following our match at East End that the tackler or challenger still can commit a foul when he gets the ball first. It's up to the referee to decide if the tackler or challenger is careless, reckless or dangerous. 

In both cases, he appears to believe to challenge was reckless, which is supposed to result in a booking.

I'd argue the challenges were careless, if that, and simply a free kick (the way it was explained to me).

However, it's come to a poor position when such a tackle is nowadays supposed to be penalised.

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum