Offline
Haven't posted on any United site for a long time due to amount of negativity. Anyway I am struggling to see why Simon Murray get's such a hard time on social media, forums etc.
He's a goalscorer first and foremost and has a great return in his limited appearances for the club. Granted he struggles sometimes with one on one's however his instinctive finishing ability is quality.
He may not have the best other qualities but effort and finishing power make him a very useful player for us.
Goal scorers are a rare breed and I think that's what he should be judged on. But what the funk do I know about time we got some positivity online.
Bert
Offline
I'd agree with you Bert, but I reckon the frustration with Murray for some (incl me) is the system he's asked to play in. He struggles to be the lone forward, although he's a real pest to the defenders closing them down.
But he isn't so great in the air or with hold up play, and really requires to be playing off a player who can do that: but we don't have one.
However, I recognise the massive scale of rebuilding which faced Ray McK when he took over, and know the changes will all take time.
Offline
Hi Pat, yes I hear exactly what you are saying there I agree with that also. I think my point is more people saying Si is not good enough and will never make it, he scores goals simple as that and goalscorers are not easy to find these days. Ideally beside a Jon Daly style player he'd score bucketloads but even without he will still score plenty imo.
Offline
Think he could get 25 goals this season which would be a good return
Offline
Some might say you're talking out your beef curtains. I think you're right though. He was not signed to be the next Pele, he was signed to hit the back of the net and hassle the opposition defence. I think his arguing over to take penalties is a bit of a minter.
Good positive posting Bert, keep it up!
A goal-a-game striker is unheard of now.
A goal-every-two-games striker is highly sought.
Any statto on here care to confirm that Simon's strike rate is better than a goal every two games, taking into his account his pitch time, i.e. e.g. playing 30 mins as a subbie in a game as well as actual starts.
I'll bet he scores one goal for every 150 mins.playing time.
Hope that's not too technical, just trying to prove a point.
Offline
I like Murray.
I'd like him better as part of a strike partnership though.
His scoring ratio is good. His biggest problem is though, that when he doesn't score, he doesn't contribute much. ( the same abuse that Boyd used to get from the dead club).
His lack of hold up play invites pressure on to our defence. He desperately needs to add this to the game. Telfer is good at it. Runs into the corner, winning petty fouls. Not that big an ask.
Good analogy with Boyd EHA but wasn't he a bit of a success?
Offline
Good stuff lads it must be the inferior sites that seem to think as I said. I think Pat nails it though as he simply is not a lone striker, maybe we will get the target man in due course. Meantime he will still notch goals.
Macho Man hmmmmmm would that be you Mr Riise ?
Sorry if I'm labouring the point but what if he doesn't hold the ball up much yet he scores two goals? He harries the defenders, chases them all over the back, keeps the ball in their half, back to the goalie etc. Who is this striker we are looking for anyway, who's good at 'holding the ball up' that we know? Daly for Russell maybe? If United choose to play with a lone striker it's not his fault. If Boyd was criticised for not holding the ball up he still was an asset to their team, scored a few against us as I recall. Murray with 3 from 5 attacking mids (VdV, Cammy, Andreu, Obadeyi, Fraser) behind him does it for me.
Last edited by smedDUm (16/9/2016 4:14 pm)
Offline
smedDUm wrote:
Sorry if I'm labouring the point but what if he doesn't hold the ball up much yet he scores two goals? He harries the defenders, chases them all over the back, keeps the ball in their half, back to the goalie etc. Who is this striker we are looking for anyway, who's good at 'holding the ball up' that we know? Daly for Russell maybe? If United choose to play with a lone striker it's not his fault. If Boyd was criticised for not holding the ball up he still was an asset to their team, scored a few against us as I recall. Murray with 3 from 5 attacking mids (VdV, Cammy, Andreu, Obadeyi, Fraser) behind him does it for me.
Like I say, I like Murray.
The boys comparison was the closest I could think of.
Rangers fans didn't like him as he scored against lesser teams and if he didn't score he didn't contribute.
Boyd didn't contribute through laziness. Murray struggles through nous and sometimes his touch is poor.
Our defence can't cope with constant pressure. We need an outball. That's the biggest criticism off him. I think it's a fair one.
We went 2-0 up against raith but were under the cosh all second half because every time we got the ball up the field it came right back down our throats.
Against Dunfermline, telfer was very good at holding it up and we held out with 10men.
I'm sure Murray is working on it as he seems that type of bloke.
It would be good to have another Ofere type option for when we are ahead or when we need a change of tactics
All I'm my opinion though
Offline
If we sign a striker who can compete physically, hold the ball up and take a goal we'll win this league.
Offline
He's played in 11 games scoring 6 goals.
Came on as a subbie 3 times.
Lasted 90 mins twice.
Played 716 mins in total which = 7.95 full matches.
That's a goal every 1.3 matches if you gauge it in these terms.
Hard to know if he'll improve much but he is keen as fuck for sure.
Easy to pick holes in his game as he is a very raw talent and doesnae seem the brightest.
I hope to fuck he proves his doubters wrong.
If effort and attidude made great players he would be a guaranteed star but think the missing part of the ginger jigsaw is how much he picks up fae the likes of Andreu, VDV and Cammy Smith.
Offline
There's no doubting the laddies positives as noted above........but he can't do it all as a lone striker, it's not his game, he needs a big experienced centre up there to feed off.
His shortfalls , largely due to being played like this are correct but not damning as his goals are very welcome......how many could it be if the right no 9 was up there beside him, wingers and attacking midfielders to support.?
Not Simon's fault.....not Raymond's fault......two useless chunts from last year got everybody in this.
Online!
I think the improvement in him since he signed has been significant.
When I first seen him play for Utd I honestly felt he wasn't a player at all.
He's obviously worked very hard on his cardio and all-round fitness as he's now proving a very useful weapon to possess in our arsenal.
He has pace,is hungry to do well for himself and is working hard.
He'll do alright for us IMO.
Top posts and thanks arabnophobia for the stats.
So If Simon scores a goal every 1.3 games, if he keeps that up he's a 25-goal striker which is no bad, when was the last time?
Love the Ginger jigsaw reference and that maybe sums it up.
Is somebody like Ofere the answer, didn't do that well for us in his few games last season, ok he was playing in a sunken team.
So really is the solution if Murray plays he needs a fellow striker and if he does we don't have such a player in the squad?
Instead of having 5 good attacking mids, 6 if you include Spittal, would Raymond have been better bringing back Ofere or something?
I don't know....
Offline
A second striker is the answer........who though is the problem facing Ray. Grateful though that he's not just signed any one just for the sake of having him like last two muppets did. Hopefully patiently still trying to find the right man to put in there with
Simon is however Plan A and Plan B at moment hence so much discussion and perhaps we'll just have to be patient.......hopefully winning like last week though.
Targets for the end of the season -
Murray 20 goals
Andreu 15
Cammy 15
VdV 8
Obadeyi 8
Fraser 6
Spittal 4
Frank & Willy 4
Rest 10
Total 90
Offline
Targets like those could win leagues
Offline
Murray 20 goals hahahahaha
Offline
Wakey wakey gents, Murray playing on his own will not get anything near that amount of goals, unless the manager plays a target man along side him, Daly Esque then we are fucked
Offline
Affshore wrote:
Wakey wakey gents, Murray playing on his own will not get anything near that amount of goals, unless the manager plays a target man along side him, Daly Esque then we are fucked
Think maist ken that but think Andreu was the scoring signing. Don't see RayMcK being given more to spend until January.
Unless we falter badly and circumstances demand.
ST will see it as the managers job to make do with what's there ATM.
Offline
Stayed off this thread before today, but yet again he provided nothing. He's not good enough. You can put all the stats up you want, but reality is he's not good enough for this level never mind premier league. Arbroath was his level.
Offline
TheShed wrote:
Stayed off this thread before today, but yet again he provided nothing. He's not good enough. You can put all the stats up you want, but reality is he's not good enough for this level never mind premier league. Arbroath was his level.
Service was non existant but movement the same across the attack.
Offline
Some fans on here want to be positive and quote stats about predicted goal ratios etc blah blah blah
Murray is never ever good enough if we are to escape this shit hole,even if he chips in with a few goals like last week his all round game is sub standard.
I will say it again being a striker is not just about scoring goals, linking the play and ball retention is more important than fluking a goal here and there.