Tekel Towers » GMS

Arabnophobia · 09/1/2016 11:51 pm

Just told he's coming on loan for sure. Decent contact. Could be wrong but will be surprised if this doesn't happen knowing the route of this info.

Leedsy2 · 10/1/2016 12:25 am

Would welcome GSM back and hope he hasn't been ruined by his sojourn with Celtic. I'd like to have Ciftci back on loan, but only if he has all his teeth out first!

Last edited by Leedsy2 (10/1/2016 12:26 am)

Arab_plumber · 10/1/2016 12:29 am

GMS would be a dream but I am very dubious he will come to us

Tek · 10/1/2016 12:30 am

Yeah heard on Thursday night fae my mole the deals 99% done and dusted.

Cue Celtic bringing him on for 15 seconds tomorrow just to cup-tie him.

He left under a huge cloud for me but beggars can't be choosers and if we can get him on form he could just about single-handedly produce the spark that keeps us up.

Time will tell though.Still taking it with a wee pinch of salt at the mo myself (though it's a good contact).

bowers · 10/1/2016 1:20 am

He comes he comes he doesnt he doesnt.

Remember this is the same gms that begged to leave our club 1 year ago
Not to fussed if we get him or no tbh

Andy · 10/1/2016 1:38 am

Yeah, agree with Bowers, out of the three that left to go to they cunts he was the one that showed no remorse, no second thought, couldn't get away quick enough.

That said, he was a very good player for us, we're fucked and he's better than what we currently have so I hope its true

Tek · 10/1/2016 1:48 am

Andy wrote:
Yeah, agree with Bowers, out of the three that left to go to they cunts he was the one that showed no remorse, no second thought, couldn't get away quick enough.

As i said mate,he left under a huge cloud for me.

But if a player of his undoubted class becomes available and is willing to come...are we in a position to turn it down right now?

TheShed · 10/1/2016 11:42 am

If he's committed and wants to play football then it's a no-brainier. Needs a change in formation tho.

lifesanocean · 10/1/2016 11:54 am

4-4-2 GMS on the left, Riski on the right, Muirhead and McKay up front. Rankin/Paton and Demel in the middle. Back four of McGowan (or Spittal actually), Donaldson/Morris, Gunning and Dixon at the back. Its not complicated. I wish football managers would stop trying to be clever.

Last edited by lifesanocean (10/1/2016 12:06 pm)

TheShed · 10/1/2016 12:06 pm

lifesanocean wrote:
4-4-2 GMS on the left, Riski on the right, Muirhead and McKay up front. Rankin/Paton and Demel in the middle. Back four of McGowan, Donaldson/Morris, Gunning and Dixon at the back. Its not complicated.

Yep, something like that. Fear it'll be more complicated to Mixu tho.

Morphman · 10/1/2016 12:20 pm

Ehd bite yir hand off for GMS back. Left under a cloud perhaps but we're crying out for pace and width, beggars can't be choosers the position we're in.

10/1/2016 12:32 pm

Have no problem with him coming back.

Was leaving when his contract was up for more money (shock, horror) - can think of places I'd rather have seen him go but I suspect he was viewed as too fragile for English championship - the decision to sell in January was Thompson's (a mistake imo).

As I've said before my only fear is that he's low on confidence and might take a while to get going

Andy · 10/1/2016 6:02 pm

Tek wrote:
Cue Celtic bringing him on for 15 seconds tomorrow just to cup-tie him.

He didn't get on, which is great if he does sign for us.

Rocky Raccoon · 10/1/2016 6:27 pm

I'm in the same boat as most of you, he couldn't wait to get out of Tannadice so I have no real love left for him. . . . . . . . . . But, on his day he is the best winger United have had since Milne & Bannon ran the show.

Rocky Raccoon · 10/1/2016 6:33 pm

If the deal does happen it'll not be done this week.

Arab_plumber · 10/1/2016 6:37 pm

Agree any deal will happen after our game with them

Foo Kin Twat · 10/1/2016 9:34 pm

I pretty much agree with all the sentiments above about GMS.

We lack cut and thrust and pace in the 3 amigo positions and the ability to quickly support McKay. I liked the look of Risky when he came on, as he looked to go forward at pace and seemed capable of going either way and with both feet.

I like Erskine and Fraser, but Erskine ran out of steam yesterday and Fraser seems to lack a bit of dig IMO and being so one footed, he comes back or goes side ways much more than he goes forward.

As well as keeping clean sheets; or minimising goals conceded, we need to solve the 3 amigo conundrum and quickly, especially as none of our two holders we play can ever be described as "playmakers".

huntedbyafreak · 10/1/2016 9:59 pm

I'm going to boo him

Foo Kin Twat · 10/1/2016 10:02 pm

huntedbyafreak wrote:
I'm going to boo him

I admire your consistency and salute it Sir! I'd expect nothing less. No one can accuse you of being bi-polar or of doing constant U-turns!!!

huntedbyafreak · 10/1/2016 10:07 pm

I'd rather we tried to get Stokes.

Edmond Dantes · 10/1/2016 10:11 pm

We must be the club that signs ex-players back the most

Gunning
Dixon
Hannah
Kirkwood
Goodwillie
McKinnon
Gomis
Brewster
Dodds
McInally
Coyle

Arab_plumber · 10/1/2016 10:50 pm

huntedbyafreak wrote:
I'd rather we tried to get Stokes.

Will boo him

huntedbyafreak · 10/1/2016 11:00 pm

Arab_plumber wrote:
huntedbyafreak wrote:
I'd rather we tried to get Stokes.
Will boo him

If we get him I'm getting a balaclava and a tricolour

Waffelz · 10/1/2016 11:00 pm

Edmond Dantes wrote:
We must be the club that signs ex-players back the most

Gunning
Dixon
Hannah
Kirkwood
Goodwillie
McKinnon
Gomis
Brewster
Dodds
McInally
Coyle

Us and Hamilton. eeeeeeeeeek

Arabnophobia · 10/1/2016 11:01 pm

Arab_plumber wrote:
huntedbyafreak wrote:
I'd rather we tried to get Stokes.
Will boo him

Find it hard to believe that a guy like Stokes could apply himself in a committed way to any other team than Septic. He even goes outside their boundaries.
He's more up the RA than up the sellic.
I'd take any striker to bail us out but just can't see him trying to do much for us.