Tekel Towers - DUFC Fans Forum

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?



27/8/2015 12:58 pm  #26


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Silver wrote:

FFS, Edinburgh may be a bigger pull than dundee for the lad.

I sincerely hope this deal gets concluded or the backlash will get ugly.

 
Very ugly

 

27/8/2015 1:02 pm  #27


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Looks like the deal is fucked, should o been done weeks ago.


 

27/8/2015 1:06 pm  #28


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Just been on Sly Sports that Sheffield Wed. are willing to consider offers or loan deals for Stevie May.

 

27/8/2015 1:08 pm  #29


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

A loan deal might be more attractive to the board than paying out cash for a fee.

 

27/8/2015 1:25 pm  #30


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

PatReilly wrote:

A loan deal might be more attractive to the board than paying out cash for a fee.

 

Jackie doeswant want loan deals remember



 
 

27/8/2015 1:38 pm  #31


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

£200 000 bid accepted for Billy Mckay!

Thank fuck for that.

Welcome to Tannadice!

 

27/8/2015 1:42 pm  #32


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Arabnophobia wrote:

£200 000 bid accepted for Billy Mckay!

Thank fuck for that.

Welcome to Tannadice!

Bit premature on the welcome. Only agreed a fee with Wigan. Not even sure if utd and player have had talks yet.
 

 

27/8/2015 2:18 pm  #33


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Oh. Welcome to contract negotiations?

 

27/8/2015 2:42 pm  #34


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Daily Ranger confirming interest from Hibbees

 

27/8/2015 3:08 pm  #35


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Chris Harvey from STV Tweeting just about a done deal, also potential for one more player after Billy Mckay.


 

27/8/2015 3:15 pm  #36


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Whar's Spencey?

Eye aff the ba since he went free lance IMO

 

27/8/2015 3:17 pm  #37


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Tangerine_Ultra wrote:

Chris Harvey from STV Tweeting just about a done deal, also potential for one more player after Billy Mckay.

 

That was about 5 hours ago was it not?

Id inagine if hibs bid and get it accepted they will offer more money to him than us



 
 

27/8/2015 4:48 pm  #38


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Arabnophobia wrote:

Oh. Welcome to contract negotiations?

  Haha yeah!

 

27/8/2015 5:22 pm  #39


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

I'd rather have spent the 200k getting rid of the manager and his mates.

However, if we do spend it on getting McKay can we now get behind the team and stop the meltdoons after every defeat?


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

27/8/2015 5:30 pm  #40


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

If we get BM and a winger I think we will be much much stronger and be pretty decent

 

27/8/2015 5:41 pm  #41


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Arab_plumber wrote:

If we get BM and a winger I think we will be much much stronger and be pretty decent

If we had a defence that was well organised we would be decent
 


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

27/8/2015 5:50 pm  #42


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Morris and Durnan will be good together, hopefully this partnership happens soon

 

27/8/2015 6:08 pm  #43


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

huntedbyafreak wrote:

I'd rather have spent the 200k getting rid of the manager and his mates.

However, if we do spend it on getting McKay can we now get behind the team and stop the meltdoons after every defeat?

Bit of a contradiction that tbh.
 

 

27/8/2015 6:20 pm  #44


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Maybe but that's what has to happen IMO


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

27/8/2015 6:27 pm  #45


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

huntedbyafreak wrote:

Maybe but that's what has to happen IMO

If we go down 3 or 4 zip to Ross County there will be a meltdown and rightfully so.

Only Mcnamara can get the fans back on side...with wins and good football.

He talks a good game..time to back up the words.
 

 

27/8/2015 6:34 pm  #46


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Last week I said we have to back or sack. I've wanted rid for months. If we spend good dough for McKay then I would take that to mean that he's being backed. These meltdoons on forums and Social media are doing no one any good.


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

27/8/2015 6:40 pm  #47


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

huntedbyafreak wrote:

Last week I said we have to back or sack. I've wanted rid for months. If we spend good dough for McKay then I would take that to mean that he's being backed. These meltdoons on forums and Social media are doing no one any good.

 
This   

 

27/8/2015 6:47 pm  #48


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

huntedbyafreak wrote:

Last week I said we have to back or sack. I've wanted rid for months. If we spend good dough for McKay then I would take that to mean that he's being backed. These meltdoons on forums and Social media are doing no one any good.

 
So everyone's to stop moaning regardless of the results because we might sign Billy McKay lol?

 

27/8/2015 7:03 pm  #49


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Everyone should give team time.


Yeah yeah Industrial Estate
 

27/8/2015 7:09 pm  #50


Re: Rumblings of a new striker being signed tomorrow

Tek wrote:

huntedbyafreak wrote:

Last week I said we have to back or sack. I've wanted rid for months. If we spend good dough for McKay then I would take that to mean that he's being backed. These meltdoons on forums and Social media are doing no one any good.

 
So everyone's to stop moaning regardless of the results because we might sign Billy McKay lol?

Only an opinion, but forums are okay for meltdowns. Where I think it's wrong, on United forums, is for posters thinking people should either be on one side, backing ST and JMac, or the other side, backing the Fed/Arabtrust.

There are probably many fans who don't sit at either extreme, and I find it over simple when a poster accuses others of being the polar opposite simply because they don't 100% agree with a point.

Happily, this site avoids that type of material in the main, as we all seem to be able to recognise that everyone wants the best for United.
 

 

Board footera

 

Powered by Boardhost. Create a Free Forum