Offline

MockChop wrote:
Trying to cut short Pappoe’s loan.
The right thing to do considering he’s not going to play again this season.
Online!

Arabdownsouth wrote:
Stillliving wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
So as expected, a cheap replacement for Ferry then
How much are we paying for Farrugia?
No idea but I doubt it's much
Your just assuming he's a cheap replacement then
Offline

Farrugia signed. Hope he exceeds some expectations...
Offline

Stillliving wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
Stillliving wrote:
How much are we paying for Farrugia?
No idea but I doubt it's much
Your just assuming he's a cheap replacement then
Compare and contrast the farewell messages of Farrugia and the boy the filth across the road just signed.
Chalk and cheese.
Fans of Bradford are gutted he has left, while Barnsley fans are in disbilief someone has paid a penny for Farrugia.
We are behind on so many levels across the board - Recruitment, Academy, Investment. Miles behind.
It is very hard to get excited about signings under the current regime when you see the dross that has been brought in under his watch.
Of course, you always want new signings to hit the ground running etc and we struck gold with Dalby (who didn't have the best reputation upon signing)
This guy has about 90 positions which fits Goodwins shoehorning tactical style.
As I've said before, giving him another window is ridiculous and if we lose on Saturday he should be gone.
I fear the next manager is going to be lumbered with his dross.
Very sad times.
Offline

Bet we were all dead chuffed when Ryan Strain signed, St Mirren fans were quite upset.
4 Months ago we had Dolcek up for the Balon D'or.
None of us were excited about Darren Dods or Noel Hunt, Conway and Swanson, fringe players for pub teams.
Whereas we were all pulling the heid aff it for Collin Samuel, Mark Kerr, Lee Miller, McIness etc
It's a funny old game.
Last edited by David_Blunkett (14/1/2026 4:11 pm)
Offline

Mind Paul Quinn was gonna to be some sort of saviour?
Offline

Conway11 wrote:
Stillliving wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
No idea but I doubt it's much
Your just assuming he's a cheap replacement thenCompare and contrast the farewell messages of Farrugia and the boy the filth across the road just signed.
Chalk and cheese.
Fans of Bradford are gutted he has left, while Barnsley fans are in disbilief someone has paid a penny for Farrugia.
We are behind on so many levels across the board - Recruitment, Academy, Investment. Miles behind.
It is very hard to get excited about signings under the current regime when you see the dross that has been brought in under his watch.
Of course, you always want new signings to hit the ground running etc and we struck gold with Dalby (who didn't have the best reputation upon signing)
This guy has about 90 positions which fits Goodwins shoehorning tactical style.
As I've said before, giving him another window is ridiculous and if we lose on Saturday he should be gone.
I fear the next manager is going to be lumbered with his dross.
Very sad times.
Intrigued enough to have a look at a couple of forums. Yes Bradford fans clearly liked Halliday but pretty clear they also think the step-up to League One was beyond him - clearly helped get promotion. Barnsley fans I'd say have fairly similar views in that it hasn't really worked out for Farrugia. Both forums say both are hard working pros.
75% of Bradford fans say they are happy with the transfer so they are not really gutted. Difference seems to be that Halliday leaves with good wishes, whereas Farrugia doesn't appear to have built up that level of support over a significantly shorter period. Halliday is also 4 years older so not exactly one for the future or with any residual value.
I get you want Goodwin gone, but what you have said on these two transfers isn't really representative of what is actually said on the forums. If the Bradford fans are made to rue their loss as Halliday eats up the SPFL then maybe you can report back - you seem to want to switch your allegiances ![]()
Offline

It is very representative on united's official social media pages. They cannot believe someone has taken Farrugia on. Boys on here will have seen them, Tek included.
Not switiching allegiances at all. I want the club to the best it can be and is currently being held back by a fraud in the dugout.
I like how you've not said your piece on being behind others off the pitch, must sting knowing its true. Because it stings me i'll have you know.
Any comments on Goodwins words "Goalkeeper is not a major concern?" maybe it'll be on a fan forum somewhere or it never happened if that's your logic?
Offline

Conway11 wrote:
It is very representative on united's official social media pages. They cannot believe someone has taken Farrugia on. Boys on here will have seen them, Tek included.
Not switiching allegiances at all. I want the club to the best it can be and is currently being held back by a fraud in the dugout.
I like how you've not said your piece on being behind others off the pitch, must sting knowing its true. Because it stings me i'll have you know.
Any comments on Goodwins words "Goalkeeper is not a major concern?" maybe it'll be on a fan forum somewhere or it never happened if that's your logic?
Haha partly levelling the playing field, partly pulling your leg.
I've represented what the forums I've looked at have said. Maybe the ones on United social media are themselves not representative.
I'll be honest I tend not to concentrate on what the Dees are doing off the pitch I don't support them. I also live in Edinburgh so I can avoid 'the banter', but the facts are we've got about twice the support and despite their best run in the league for years they are still behind us. I'd like rid of Ogren, but I still think he's invested better in us than the Dee's Americans - at least he's not spinning us bullshit on a new ground. On Recruitment see league position. On Academy see league position. I'd have Goodwin over Pressley any day of the week. I'm not really sure we are behind the Dees on anything apart from derby banter rights.
I'd fully expect a good manager to be saying the goalkeeper is not a major concern. He can hardly say it is major concern. The question which I will give you is whether he genuinely means that. I fully expect, as he has said, that he is looking to strengthen in that department. I'll be extremely disappointed if Richards is our number one post the January window, but similarly I don't think there is any point bringing in someone for the sake of it if we don't think we can find (and afford) better. I have also said that our CHs are not good enough in the air which was why Kuch didn't work. Richards issue seems not to be chucking it in the net, but laying it on a plate for a striker as doesn't seem to be able to parry around the post - we're not going to train that in to him now. Goodwin must see that but he isn't going to throw Richards under the bus with no replacement.
That said, Richards is no Birrighitti so I don't see him relegating us.
Offline

I personally couldn’t care less who Dundee have signed, or how upset Bradford City fans are.
Offline

Stillliving wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
Stillliving wrote:
How much are we paying for Farrugia?
No idea but I doubt it's much
Your just assuming he's a cheap replacement then
Sodo you think otherwise?
Online!

If we had signed him from Shamrock Rovers where he clearly had a good pedigree and we have had good success in signing Irish players in the modern era then the mood of fans for the same player would have been almost universally positive I reckon. He's moved someplace and his career has stalled. Lets give the boy a chance eh?
Last edited by lifesanocean (15/1/2026 9:13 am)
Offline

Welcome Neil
Online!

Arabdownsouth wrote:
Stillliving wrote:
Arabdownsouth wrote:
No idea but I doubt it's much
Your just assuming he's a cheap replacement then
Sodo you think otherwise?
I don't know the financial details of the deal that's why I wouldn't make a comment on it.
My guess would be that he will be taking a wage cut to come here.
I would also predict that watching Barnsley at Liverpool the other night they would beat the current.UTD side.
Offline

lifesanocean wrote:
If we had signed him from Shamrock Rovers where he clearly had a good pedigree and we have had good success in signing Irish players in the modern era then the mood of fans for the same player would have been almost universally positive I reckon. He's moved someplace and his career has stalled. Lets give the boy a chance eh?
Very true.
The Barnsley fans comments were slightly concerning, but fresh slate and a chance to continue what has (but for a minor bump in the road) been a very successful football career, thus far.
As you said, let's give the lad a chance and judge him in a United jersey.
Offline

He also makes a decent point in his Courier interview. He'd just played a full 40 game season with Shamrock, who I think play through the summer and then turned up at Barnsley without having had a break.
Offline

lifesanocean wrote:
If we had signed him from Shamrock Rovers where he clearly had a good pedigree and we have had good success in signing Irish players in the modern era then the mood of fans for the same player would have been almost universally positive I reckon. He's moved someplace and his career has stalled. Lets give the boy a chance eh?
Exactly.
Not to mention that you'll get some who for whatever reason don't fit in one side, get a move then things come up trumps ( Dalby)
Similarly to Farrugia's Shamrock form Ferry's pedigree shone at the end of last season. He'd have been a more saleable asset. Look now. A fact not lost on him.
Last edited by Shakey Isles Arab (15/1/2026 11:20 am)
Offline

16th day of the window.
Absolutely nothing on the goalkeeping front.
Offline
Shakey Isles Arab wrote:
lifesanocean wrote:
If we had signed him from Shamrock Rovers where he clearly had a good pedigree and we have had good success in signing Irish players in the modern era then the mood of fans for the same player would have been almost universally positive I reckon. He's moved someplace and his career has stalled. Lets give the boy a chance eh?
Exactly.
Not to mention that you'll get some who for whatever reason don't fit in one side, get a move then things come up trumps ( Dalby)
Similarly to Farrugia's Shamrock form Ferry's pedigree shone at the end of last season. He'd have been a more saleable asset. Look now. A fact not lost on him.
To add to this, I had a wee look at the Barnsley fans comments regarding Ferrugia, and while I'm willing to believe them that he wasn't great for them, from Barnsley social media responses in general it seems it's not a great club to be around at the moment. That's not a slight at their supporters, but it seems like they feel ownership, managers and the playing squad need freshened up across the board after a fairly stale couple of year(sounds familiar?
).
Maybe a change of scenery will bring him back to his best. Irish players have certainly done very well for us in recent years, Ritchie Ryan the only disappointment that stands out for me, remember him?
Offline

We have Ayr United tomorrow and I would hope that between Richards and Adams that we are well enough covered for that game.
I'd prefer us to take a bit of time and hope we get the best keeper we can in time for the next league game as opposed to rushing it to cover us for a cup game against lower league opposition.
Offline

There's two weeks left of the window, so plenty of time I suppose, but from i'd say Easter Road away, the alarm bells must've been ringing...
Maybe we had to wait until we could ship one out but getting someone in for tomorrow, would have given them what should be an easier tie to play in, get to know his defence and then give a week to be ready.
Maybe finances are playing a part, but the longer we don't address it, the more desperate we might become, Hamish can't work the hospitality suites if we need him to pick up the gloves again!
Last edited by David_Blunkett (16/1/2026 1:22 pm)
MockChop wrote:
16th day of the window.
Absolutely nothing on the goalkeeping front.
I'm backing Dave.
With Roory waiting in the wings.
Don't want some random new dodgy goalie.
Give Dave more backing, he's earned it.
Offline

United Arab Emarite wrote:
MockChop wrote:
16th day of the window.
Absolutely nothing on the goalkeeping front.I'm backing Dave.
With Roory waiting in the wings.
Don't want some random new dodgy goalie.
Give Dave more backing, he's earned it.
Na for me made about as much errors as kucherenko- he’s a number 2 all day long
Been a dreadful window up to now
Online!

David_Blunkett wrote:
I get there's not much positivity around at the moment and as has been said above fans opinions on football forums/Twitter etc shouldn't be taken as gospel or any true reflection of the facts, you get an overly negative viewpoint from a small section of the support.
A lot of the same places regularly post their best XI containing Sibbald.
Our midfielders have been hung out to dry this season because of Goodwin's dogmatic insistence on playing 343.
2 midfielders often left to battle against an opposing 3.
2 midfielders that often leave you with the impression that they've been asked to play despite not being 100% fit.
The 3 at the back, playing without traditional fullbacks were consistently playing a high line leaving big spaces behind them and very often racing out to the byline to try and put a fire out which in turn leaves big gaps in the middle. . Whereas last season Gallacher and Holt spent the majority of their defensive duties in and around the 18 yard box, smashing anything that came near them, including with their heads.
343 has given us glimpses of fantastic football but it's also caused us endless defensive problems which impact on midfield and the instruction to Ricgards to kick long every time is putting more pressure on that midfield 2 when we inevitably lose the ball from Richards kicking.
Goodwin is damaging us with this stubborn attitude.
He needs to stop the easy goals against us by going 4 at the back,
so most likely 451, 3 midfielders with the striker selected getting support from 2 pacy wide players.
An example being this
Richards
Strain
SCH
Graham
Ferry
Stephenson
Sibbald
Camara
Nammo
Fatah
Sapsford
It's not a defensive lineup as such because the attacking power is there from Stephenson Fatah and Sapsford.
So just to repeat my point in case it got lost in that rant it's the 2 in the middle selection by Goodwin that's making our midfielders look poor.
Offline

All fair points, that I couldn't disagree with any of them.
I just think Sibbald isn't good enough when asked to play in a role where he has to do more than the basics, injuries have probably forced the issue, if Naamo or Strain is fit it frees up Stephenson and I'd have Sevelj in there ahead of Sibbald.
But ultimately Goodwin chopping and changing the personnel, having to change the formation/tactics mid game so often is on him, we don't seem to have a recognised style of play at all.