lifesanocean wrote:

TheShed wrote:

blackandtangerine wrote:

Funny you should say that. Few boys from fed were at a meeting with mcnamara and were talking about flood. He said he wasnt a great loss as flood never listened to instructions and basically done his own thing.
 

 
He seemed to follow Mcinnes's instructions at Aberdeen and keep his position fine, maybe it's down to the managers?

Agreed. I can think of at least 3 occasions under McInnes where he was MOM for Aberdeen against us and basically ran the game and snuffed out our attacking players.
 

 
Not managed MOM, ran game nor snuffed out opposition in games I've been at this season.....maybe McInnes realised he wasn't up to it anymore as well.

Tangerine'n'Black wrote:

Billy_Hainey wrote:

Dinna ken if anychunt would agree we me, but I felt for a long time that Willo only seems to pass in the direction that he's running in.

 
He does .....then follows the pass to the player and demands a 1 yard pass back wtf is all that in aid of, achieves nowt......just lets opposition close them all down.

I liked Willo but the game he plays as described by TnB is not/no longer the game we need. If he is to stay, I would prefer it if he played as the sitting mid closing down, challenging, hopefully winning and passing on to someone who can genuine create, staying in position instead of following the ball out with these stupid wee too & fro go nowhere passes . Think he could do a job like that for us - however, where do we get the creatives?